From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Athira Rajeev" <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf annotate: fall back to original binary if build-id cache entry is not a valid ELF
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 03:59:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260907035940.B506F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907034554.714-2-atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Spurious warning emitted for missing build-id cache files and valid kallsyms cache entries.
--
commit 4a56442e475b7351d0cee0b5ef94464e2d112fe2
Author: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.ibm.com>
perf annotate: fall back to original binary if build-id cache entry is not a valid ELF
This commit adds a check to verify that a build-id cache file is actually a
valid ELF before passing it to objdump. If the file is not a valid ELF, it
emits a warning and falls back to the original binary path.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
> index 6cfdbabbb8c7d..e263a2a8715dd 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/disasm.c
> @@ -1201,6 +1201,12 @@ static int dso__disassemble_filename(struct dso *dso, char *filename, size_t fil
> if (len < 0)
> goto fallback;
>
> + if (!is_valid_elf(filename)) {
> + pr_warning("build-id cache file is not a valid ELF, falling back to original binary: %s\n",
> + filename);
> + goto fallback;
> + }
> +
[Severity: Medium]
Will this emit spurious warnings for missing build-id cache files or valid
kallsyms cache entries?
When perf annotate looks up a build-id and finds a kallsyms entry (which is a
plain text copy of /proc/kallsyms, not an ELF) or a dangling symlink (missing
file), the newly added is_valid_elf() check evaluates to false.
Because this check is placed before the original access() and
strstr(..., DSO__NAME_KALLSYMS) checks, it preempts the expected silent
fallback paths and prints a warning.
> linkname[len] = '\0';
> if (strstr(linkname, DSO__NAME_KALLSYMS) ||
> access(filename, R_OK)) {
> fallback:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260907034554.714-1-atrajeev@linux.ibm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-07 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 3:45 [PATCH 1/3] perf build-id: add shared is_valid_elf() helper Athira Rajeev
2026-09-07 3:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf annotate: fall back to original binary if build-id cache entry is not a valid ELF Athira Rajeev
2026-09-07 3:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07 3:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf buildid-cache: skip caching non-ELF files and treat unreadable build-id as mismatch Athira Rajeev
2026-09-07 4:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-07 3:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf build-id: add shared is_valid_elf() helper sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260907035940.B506F1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=atrajeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox