From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: waiting.sh: Replace timestamp polling with sleep
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 15:27:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908152735.A41481F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908152053.192830-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> The waiting helpers implement timeouts using:
>
> date +%s%1N
>
> This relies on GNU coreutils date truncating %N to the specified width,
> so %1N yields tenths of a second.
>
> Rust coreutils (uutils) interprets the width differently and does not
> truncate the nanoseconds field. Consequently "date +%1N" returns all
> nine nanosecond digits, causing the elapsed-time calculation to be done
> in nanoseconds while timeout values remain in tenths of a second.
>
> As a result, timeout comparisons succeed immediately and the waiting
> helpers time out on their first iteration. This causes
> test_intel_pt.sh to fail on systems using uutils "date".
>
> Avoid implementation-specific date formatting entirely. Instead, wait
> for 100 ms on each iteration and count the timeout down. Besides fixing
> the portability issue, this removes the busy-waiting behaviour in
> wait_for_perf_to_start(), which could otherwise consume CPU while
> waiting for perf record to start.
>
> Since the timeout is now based on repeated sleeps, it is only
> approximate. Update the comments accordingly. Also make is_running()
> wait for exactly the documented number of tenths by changing its timeout
> test from -gt to the new logic, and quote tm_out in the modified code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260908152053.192830-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 15:20 [PATCH] perf test: waiting.sh: Replace timestamp polling with sleep Adrian Hunter
2026-09-08 15:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-08 17:14 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-08 21:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908152735.A41481F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox