Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: waiting.sh: Replace timestamp polling with sleep
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2026 15:27:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908152735.A41481F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908152053.192830-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>

> The waiting helpers implement timeouts using:
> 
>   date +%s%1N
> 
> This relies on GNU coreutils date truncating %N to the specified width,
> so %1N yields tenths of a second.
> 
> Rust coreutils (uutils) interprets the width differently and does not
> truncate the nanoseconds field.  Consequently "date +%1N" returns all
> nine nanosecond digits, causing the elapsed-time calculation to be done
> in nanoseconds while timeout values remain in tenths of a second.
> 
> As a result, timeout comparisons succeed immediately and the waiting
> helpers time out on their first iteration.  This causes
> test_intel_pt.sh to fail on systems using uutils "date".
> 
> Avoid implementation-specific date formatting entirely.  Instead, wait
> for 100 ms on each iteration and count the timeout down.  Besides fixing
> the portability issue, this removes the busy-waiting behaviour in
> wait_for_perf_to_start(), which could otherwise consume CPU while
> waiting for perf record to start.
> 
> Since the timeout is now based on repeated sleeps, it is only
> approximate.  Update the comments accordingly.  Also make is_running()
> wait for exactly the documented number of tenths by changing its timeout
> test from -gt to the new logic, and quote tm_out in the modified code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260908152053.192830-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com?part=1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-08 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08 15:20 [PATCH] perf test: waiting.sh: Replace timestamp polling with sleep Adrian Hunter
2026-09-08 15:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-08 17:14 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-08 21:06   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260908152735.A41481F00A3E@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox