Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Thomas Falcon" <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] perf tools: Show memory region in perf-script subcommand
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:17:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909161711.DFA981F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909160218.174928-6-thomas.falcon@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Integer underflow leading to stack buffer overflow if the accumulated string length reaches the buffer size in `perf_mem__region_scnprintf`.
- [Low] Unnecessary full header inclusion of "session.h" in mem-events.h instead of using a forward declaration.
--

commit f7491b8d4beca72ae600f38adac9d0669b182411
Author: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

perf tools: Show memory region in perf-script subcommand

Show the memory region in perf-script subcommand. Memory region is found
in the mem_region field of the memory information data source.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260114011750.350569-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com/

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.h b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.h
> index daa22748f9fea..4ebb8109fc3c4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>  
>  #include <stdbool.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include "session.h"

[Severity: Low]
Does this code introduce unnecessary namespace pollution and risk musl 
compilation failures? The subsystem guidelines recommend using a forward 
declaration for struct perf_session instead of a full header inclusion 
when only structure pointer handles are referenced.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> index 4fd48fd200552..8ce4996cad8d3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
[ ... ]
> +static int perf_mem__region_scnprintf(char *out, size_t sz, const struct mem_info *mem_info)
>  {
> +	size_t l = 0;
> +	u64 mem = PERF_MEM_REGION_NA;
> +
> +	sz -= 1; /* -1 for null termination */
> +	out[0] = '\0';

[Severity: Medium]
Can this lead to an integer underflow and a stack buffer overflow?

In perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf, the characters written are accumulated 
in i. If i grows larger than or equal to the initial buffer size (e.g. 200) 
due to previous print operations, sz - i passed to 
perf_mem__region_scnprintf evaluates to 0. 

When sz is 0 in perf_mem__region_scnprintf, sz -= 1 underflows to the 
maximum unsigned size. The subsequent out[0] assignment writes 
out-of-bounds, and scnprintf receives the maximum size as its limit, which 
can cause a massive buffer overflow when parsing a complex perf.data file.

[ ... ]

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260909160218.174928-1-thomas.falcon@intel.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 16:02 [PATCH v7 0/6] perf: Add support for memory region/range reporting Thomas Falcon
2026-09-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] perf mem: Fix size tracking for mem_lvl's in perf_script__meminfo_scnprintf() Thomas Falcon
2026-09-09 16:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] perf mem: Add support for printing PERF_MEM_LVLNUM_L0 Thomas Falcon
2026-09-09 16:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] perf header: Support memory ranges Thomas Falcon
2026-09-09 16:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] perf tools: Show memory region in perf-c2c subcommand Thomas Falcon
2026-09-09 16:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-10  2:19   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-09-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] perf tools: Show memory region in perf-script subcommand Thomas Falcon
2026-09-09 16:17   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-10  2:22   ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-09-10 14:10     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-09 16:02 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] perf c2c: print memory region data with stdio output Thomas Falcon
2026-09-09 16:12   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909161711.DFA981F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox