From: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: sashiko-bot@kernel.org, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf synthetic-events: Check schedstat domain allocation failure
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:36:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260912053636.2242958-1-sh_def@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912032114.A02C91F000FF@smtp.kernel.org>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 03:21:14AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but there is a pre-existing issue
> in the caller perf_event__synthesize_schedstat().
>
> If the loop in perf_event__synthesize_schedstat() encounters a line starting
> with a character other than 'c' or 'd' (such as an unhandled trailing
> newline or a new record type from a newer kernel):
[...]
> Does this check incorrectly assume the event pointer is NULL if an unrecognized
> line is parsed?
>
> Because the event pointer is freed at the end of the previous iteration but not
> reset to NULL, it retains a dangling pointer. The check if (!event) will pass,
> leading the code to actively pass the stale pointer to the process() callback:
[...]
> Could this trigger a use-after-free and a subsequent double-free?
>
> Would it be safer to initialize the event pointer to NULL at the start of
> each loop iteration?
Good catch. I confirmed that this is a valid pre-existing bug.
After a successful iteration, `event` is freed but not reset to NULL. If a
subsequent iteration starts with an unrecognized schedstat record type, no new
event is assigned. The stale pointer therefore passes the `if (!event)` check,
may be passed to `process()`, and may then be freed again on that iteration.
While checking the event lifetime in this loop, I also noticed another
pre-existing issue: when `user_requested_cpus` filters out the synthesized
event, the `continue` path skips `free(event)`, leaking the event.
These issues were introduced in the same schedstat synthesis code, but they
are independent of the missing allocation check fixed by this patch. I will
keep this patch focused on the allocation failure and send a separate patch
fixing the event lifetime in `perf_event__synthesize_schedstat()`.
Thanks for catching this.
Hui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-12 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 3:11 [PATCH] perf synthetic-events: Check schedstat domain allocation failure Hui Su
2026-09-12 3:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-12 5:36 ` Hui Su [this message]
2026-09-26 10:31 ` Hui Su
2026-09-26 18:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260912053636.2242958-1-sh_def@163.com \
--to=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox