From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alireza Haghdoost" <haghdoost@uber.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf symbols: Fix broken ELF_C_READ_MMAP fallback guard
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 18:53:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260915185318.0573C1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915-perf-symbol-memory-send-v1-1-1d3360e21f07@uber.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] perf: build failure on systems lacking ELF_C_READ_MMAP enum
--
commit d38dd3de1c465f53af2cb4e7df04744c926b7ed6
Author: Alireza Haghdoost <haghdoost@uber.com>
perf symbols: Fix broken ELF_C_READ_MMAP fallback guard
This patch attempts to make perf mmap ELF files by unconditionally defining
PERF_ELF_C_READ_MMAP to ELF_C_READ_MMAP. It removes the previous guard
because ELF_C_READ_MMAP is an enum rather than a preprocessor macro.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> @@ -57,15 +57,8 @@ static inline bool is_livepatch_symbol(const char *str)
> return strstarts(str, KLP_SYM_PREFIX);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * libelf 0.8.x and earlier do not support ELF_C_READ_MMAP;
> - * for newer versions we can use mmap to reduce memory usage:
> - */
> -#ifdef ELF_C_READ_MMAP
> -# define PERF_ELF_C_READ_MMAP ELF_C_READ_MMAP
> -#else
> -# define PERF_ELF_C_READ_MMAP ELF_C_READ
> -#endif
> +/* libelf falls back to internal reads when mmap fails (e.g. non-seekable fd). */
> +#define PERF_ELF_C_READ_MMAP ELF_C_READ_MMAP
[Severity: Low]
Will this cause compilation errors on systems where the libelf.h header lacks
the ELF_C_READ_MMAP enum?
By unconditionally assigning PERF_ELF_C_READ_MMAP to ELF_C_READ_MMAP in
tools/perf/util/symbol.h, this bypasses build feature detection. On systems
with libelf implementations that do not provide ELF_C_READ_MMAP, such as
elftoolchain on FreeBSD and macOS, this triggers an undeclared identifier
compilation error.
The commit message notes that objtool uses an #ifndef guard which works fine,
but since ELF_C_READ_MMAP is an enum in libelf, that #ifndef in objtool
silently evaluates to true and incorrectly downgrades all mmap reads to
standard reads instead of actually using mmap.
Could we restore a proper feature detection mechanism here rather than
relying on an unconditional definition?
>
> #ifdef HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT
> Elf_Scn *elf_section_by_name(Elf *elf, GElf_Ehdr *ep,
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260915-perf-symbol-memory-send-v1-0-1d3360e21f07@uber.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 18:42 [PATCH 0/4] perf script: Bounded and lazy symbol loading Alireza Haghdoost via B4 Relay
2026-09-15 18:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf symbols: Fix broken ELF_C_READ_MMAP fallback guard Alireza Haghdoost via B4 Relay
2026-09-15 18:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-15 19:04 ` Alireza Haghdoost
2026-09-17 0:30 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-15 18:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf script: Add --max-symbol-bytes to bound ELF symbol memory Alireza Haghdoost via B4 Relay
2026-09-15 19:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 16:15 ` Alireza Haghdoost
2026-09-17 6:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-19 18:37 ` Alireza Haghdoost
2026-09-15 18:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf script: Add --lazy-load-symbols for lazy symbol loading Alireza Haghdoost via B4 Relay
2026-09-15 18:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 16:18 ` Alireza Haghdoost
2026-09-17 7:24 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-09-19 23:22 ` Alireza Haghdoost
2026-09-15 18:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf script: Document and test --lazy-load-symbols and --max-symbol-bytes Alireza Haghdoost via B4 Relay
2026-09-15 18:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-16 16:21 ` Alireza Haghdoost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260915185318.0573C1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=haghdoost@uber.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox