From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] perf/x86/intel: Fix DKT PEBS load/store direction for latency events
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 02:09:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917020923.C82D31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917015234.981153-4-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> Same issue exists on Darkmont, intel_dkt_pebs_event_constraints[]
> applies LAT_CONSTRAINT constraints to
> MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.{LOAD,STORE}_LATENCY, but does not set explicit
> LOAD/STORE flags for those events.
>
> The PEBS latency path (pebs_latency_data(), via cmt_latency_data) uses
> the event flags to determine memory operation direction. Without an
> explicit STORE flag, samples from MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.STORE_LATENCY can be
> misclassified as LOADs.
>
> Set explicit LOAD/STORE flags in intel_dkt_pebs_event_constraints[] for:
> - MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.LOAD_LATENCY
> - MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.STORE_LATENCY
>
> This fixes incorrect STORE sample classification. Additionally remove
> INTEL_HYBRID_LAT_CONSTRAINT() since no one uses it anymore.
>
> Fixes: 65fd435095bb ("perf/x86/intel: Update event constraints for PTL")
> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917015234.981153-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 1:52 [PATCH 00/12] perf/x86/intel: PEBS data-source fixes and OMR updates Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf/x86/intel: Fix GRT PEBS load/store direction for latency events Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf/x86/intel: Fix CMT " Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf/x86/intel: Fix DKT " Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf/x86/intel: Update arw_latency_data() mem-op direction handling Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf/x86/intel: Remove incorrect LionCove PEBS data-source constraints Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf/x86/intel: Remove incorrect PantherCove " Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf/x86/intel: Correct Panther cove data source snoop states Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf/x86/intel: Delete dead NVL PEBS data-source init call Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf/x86/intel: Constrain PantherCove UOPS_DISPATCHED events Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf/x86/intel: Add precise OMR event support for DMR/NVL Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf/x86/intel: Rename DMR offcore_rsp attribute to offmodule_rsp Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-17 1:52 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf/x86/intel: Rename NVL " Dapeng Mi
2026-09-17 2:14 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917020923.C82D31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox