Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hui Peng" <benquike@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: fix locked_vm leak on alias mmap() and cross-MM pinned_vm underflow
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 22:31:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260919223120.428691F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919221728.3707189-1-benquike@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] perf: mmdrop() in RCU callback causes softirq context violation
--

commit f66e9c8b5f2a9c636e7dc5afd975c9e2ed17cf78
Author: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>

perf/core: fix locked_vm leak on alias mmap() and cross-MM pinned_vm underflow

In perf_mmap(), mapping an output ring buffer onto an event via
PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT / alias mmap() increments user->locked_vm and
mm->pinned_vm without recording the accounting MM on the ring_buffer or
releasing user_extra onperf_mmap_close(), causing a permanent locked_vm
leak and a cross-MM pinned_vm underflow when the mapping is closed in a
different process. Store the accounted mm_struct on struct perf_buffer
and unaccount against the original mm_struct on close.

> diff --git a/kernel/events/internal.h b/kernel/events/internal.h
> index c03c4f2eea571..f10eacd8b5903 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/events/internal.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -67,6 +70,10 @@ static inline void rb_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu_head)
>  	struct perf_buffer *rb;
>  
>  	rb = container_of(rcu_head, struct perf_buffer, rcu_head);
> +	if (rb->aux_mmap_mm)
> +		mmdrop(rb->aux_mmap_mm);
> +	if (rb->mmap_mm)
> +		mmdrop(rb->mmap_mm);

[Severity: High]
Does this code call mmdrop() in an RCU callback, which executes in a softirq
context?

If this mmdrop() drops the final mm_count reference (for instance, if the
original process has already exited), it synchronously invokes __mmdrop().
__mmdrop() performs blocking teardown operations (such as pgd_free() and
percpu_counter_destroy()) which can sleep.

Sleeping in a softirq context is illegal and leads to a kernel BUG or panic.

This could happen if a process mmaps a perf event to create a ring buffer,
which uses mmgrab() to increment mm_count. If the process then exits, dropping
its own mm reference, and later the ring buffer is unmapped (e.g., by another
process closing the alias), this triggers ring_buffer_put(), which schedules
rb_free_rcu() via call_rcu(). The RCU callback then drops the final reference
and triggers the bug.

Should this teardown be deferred to the workqueue (rb_free_work) which runs
in a process context, or perhaps use mmdrop_async() instead?

>  	free_uid(rb->mmap_user);
>  	rb_free(rb);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260919221728.3707189-1-benquike@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 22:17 [PATCH] perf/core: fix locked_vm leak on alias mmap() and cross-MM pinned_vm underflow Hui Peng
2026-09-19 22:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-21  0:33 ` [PATCH v2] perf/core: fix user->locked_vm leak on secondary mmap() Hui Peng
2026-09-21  0:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 15:10   ` krzk
2026-09-21 15:13   ` krzk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260919223120.428691F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=benquike@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox