From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Stian Halseth" <stian@itx.no>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] perf/core: Let an arch prepare and locate the user stack dump
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 09:16:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923091609.D4C101F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923090429.2026529-2-stian@itx.no>
> PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER copies the user stack as it is in memory,
> starting at the user stack pointer. Two things about sparc64 do not
> fit that.
>
> The sampled window's %l and %i registers, including the frame pointer
> and return address an unwinder starts from, may still be in the
> register file: they only reach the stack when a window spills.
> perf_callchain_user() already handles this for the callchain by calling
> flushw_user() first; the user stack dump has no equivalent arch entry
> point.
>
> And a 64-bit stack pointer is biased by 2047: the stack starts at
> %sp + 2047. Starting the dump at the register value spends a quarter of
> an 8K dump on memory below the frame, and gives no dump at all when that
> page has never been touched, as for a leaf frame at the deepest point a
> thread's stack has reached.
>
> Add two hooks in the style of perf_arch_misc_flags():
> perf_arch_prepare_ustack(), a no-op by default, called from
> perf_prepare_sample() before the dump size is computed, and
> perf_arch_user_stack_pointer(), user_stack_pointer() by default, the
> address the dump starts at. Flushing in the arch PMU interrupt handler
> instead would not do: software events such as cpu-clock reach
> perf_event_overflow() without passing through it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stian Halseth <stian@itx.no>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923090429.2026529-1-stian@itx.no?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 9:04 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] perf: sparc64 user regs and stack dump, with arch hooks Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] perf/core: Let an arch prepare and locate the user stack dump Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 9:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-23 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] sparc64: Support PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER and PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 9:04 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] perf tools: Support sparc user register samples and dwarf unwinding Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 9:42 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 16:02 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-23 19:36 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 20:38 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] perf: sparc64 user regs and stack dump, with arch hooks Ian Rogers
2026-09-23 20:56 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 21:16 ` Ian Rogers
2026-09-24 17:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-24 17:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-09-25 7:33 ` Stian Halseth
2026-09-23 23:10 ` Magnus Lindholm
2026-09-24 8:20 ` Stian Halseth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923091609.D4C101F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stian@itx.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox