From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A382B4EBAC5 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 22:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790633573; cv=none; b=CNaE3c//jnIUi9EJtr1yFOnVudm7FpyGFTE1X0qoyrNB/6j+jSIVSuBro4C49uXEcMvZ2x3F/GDy3QeG7sLHsXc06J1p/2sEPFzVtqAX938e46hFBx5Zdg3Qt5T6wDNkexa3tGzlT6Bkh4BrHZLtgQStGXv22zZCNX+YuHkwZKI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790633573; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ncq8wJQxdpNvUDQOo7CvvTSMqfZwcK1X23kruFmZI5k=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=jpP/SZNY27ReKsdtz6dPdWR1buaarnGAijVuZ1i+nGqk2h+Ad57xRqqnZBnQSMXpwvkyJJuB0JobnLOZB+KOi8zGZu29BgCGWA7auj//iTnaSj7nNAilT5YbjlUm/TIQKcjT/XpDRTVqTex7lsNeeaawze7qz8wy9u/VEorWnWM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=A0WH2pvE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="A0WH2pvE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C8A01F000FF; Mon, 28 Sep 2026 22:12:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790633572; bh=fc7KKdxYnk8FQTiUhPUkucEdQsMZOg3S8MixI9IW3l4=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=A0WH2pvEhZYMwlXPmeAzl5Z9gtwSX1uPW5rB3CWb3tZJS5aphhgKCkAJ69lDHhuEq DkC8ioW7LPQ/wP+3ApzauqPItnCo0gx3pkV8AeiBlb97Gt19lzWP2Q3JSvJvo62w9Z rmcSH82BSIJflOPItuFH+OGw21ZR7zio4xS5pSKMERglhdtOKAGDMLz+QVW/uw2cgH aNG0f8PQ4HBeNx83Gjbrp/rqbNCx3HLmP1wiDsfx6tOzQDF83OApzDIRsuhKjHyAOF JVRyQN+M/QOyvoaX7tq61xMwKGsyD2eq2nnLoSK4sy6CC6SEaYSAZAzFtx9gvJG1sv m7HizMBTfa5bw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf report: Add --progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260928220634.2451784-3-acme@kernel.org> References: <20260928220634.2451784-1-acme@kernel.org> <20260928220634.2451784-3-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 22:12:51 +0000 Message-Id: <20260928221252.0C8A01F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Processing a large session with stdio output gives no feedback about > which phase perf is in or how far along it is: ui_progress updates are > only shown by the TUI. Add --progress, installing a stdio backend > (ui/stdio/progress.c) that prints the phase title, percentage and > counts: >=20 > Processing events... [42.3%] 317M / 746M >=20 > Phases can be nested, so the backend tracks the ones started to > complete the right one on ui_progress__finish(); that requires > init()/finish() pairs, fixed in ordered-events.c and the pipe and > directory event processing. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928220634.2451= 784-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D2