From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7FCD346ADB; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790709783; cv=none; b=VqxcqaGsKKIb/seX+QnyVCfh1+IWMiNU9PIh8ePXhObV61kv/hlsdkwETTL4uTwtSn6ka59PAYw9Zv5e7j5qGuSVZYkmx+a+c2Rm8YPv3cqCFIfKTkaAsCx95GMp8OQZLvOeNg0fygGd633LfsogZiTiM6yOn/Hn1AnMO3hwe48= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790709783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Op35jOFEVO8q1FpaZPLqCmdjlEUyMgZq4FjE74YSMO4=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=PRhiqP08coPmYVVYbvsE2RZRwy4W0q1JNoZuvy/uHgYi6UQpvI/TuAXMSWZ3FBt1rPTDinI0s/KIutbfnvOrvPoUIyF6+G3/9Kz33YXYHz+9tgDaoR5mblaD+1Qzpjtxf7HzN+hDlkMvZO6eli8qy8bx+K/Yh70xUkA8mA3xG5Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XBip+Ryi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XBip+Ryi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C29B1F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:23:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790709781; bh=s+HEq5AYNCtq+yb9nxheQ3wUZ4LJAr2Uxenvd5vaqRM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=XBip+RyiYP+7zRteSGS0ClPlLvcl4yO/VsWXzy4dfJMf44ExrT+GyDXOXPDT/cKRQ ir5QS5X5qy8dVhtNIktqavVEM1vyKNhLBv7j6+kTE315bI2XqogCewYvy6rOSzPv2Q C9fLeQzbM5rnsXix18WRfZtcQI0ETEPzmerr9YliZ471xJl/d4flOXum9RMwZUO8q3 93Ht5Y0vO1SpL1VyrChOsWym03s20hE5c/TgYiKqcIaLv3w9bRO+DDK6VOAYjzAL5l PEQnkUNrAMgsjAZDkLTwDus2FxivBFqNQ97yCrl83NeFUYy154T5MtCC6rvbVdTCNO nXMBRRJfPOkIw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 6.1 2/2] perf test bpf: Address error about non-null argument for epoll_pwait 2nd arg Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Florian Fainelli" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260929191834.266354-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> References: <20260929191834.266354-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> <20260929191834.266354-3-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 19:23:00 +0000 Message-Id: <20260929192301.4C29B1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > commit ed847e30f001b207013b6136c264454d7560557f upstream >=20 > First noticed on Fedora Rawhide: >=20 > tests/bpf.c: In function =E2=80=98epoll_pwait_loop=E2=80=99: > tests/bpf.c:36:17: error: argument 2 null where non-null expected [-Wer= ror=3Dnonnull] > 36 | epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > In file included from tests/bpf.c:5: > /usr/include/sys/epoll.h:134:12: note: in a call to function =E2=80=98e= poll_pwait=E2=80=99 declared =E2=80=98nonnull=E2=80=99 > 134 | extern int epoll_pwait (int __epfd, struct epoll_event *__event= s, > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >=20 > [ ... ] > Cc: Jiri Olsa > Cc: Namhyung Kim > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZMj8+bvN86D0ZKiB@kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260929191834.2663= 54-2-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com?part=3D2