From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1675523394A for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790713384; cv=none; b=pj0Qv4txPaHMSB+lT6bZjU6lrZqp7hSHxngPeAkh8ISEHILcjzP6LUwAgppPH6nthZnLxjki84MhMxwSyNZh4btZ2AGglSyRFjRVJFTKfu26NATng16TE24VHQbiPVmxgbrgm7GCW9cQZ032SDzIYXRSyEiqEJ9Qn+Do18tXyoc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790713384; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/xmRVn1Y7Najlpu5RNRFyAaVzOhu0NqznVNlMoxbFMo=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=m/GHgrweaEschpJe4az8ZET7YVWziGy+xDt0HlHeU7xLSwUlWvy5GH12YyhmunXbdweky8qKJYq5+o2sTYv2MA4ivod2wBuggF5NU4T0L9vsPjgxx21k71OCF2zudbhPVlm/CNpmmGrgaoyxMVLmK0UtZuKFy+m6jFRMMrfK26g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mAWtgqWb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mAWtgqWb" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F7ED1F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:23:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790713382; bh=DmhcEdGZmxrKnwT7g8ur1Vbtjps6N2sf392Y1ZL4tM0=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=mAWtgqWb3AyB7yBhiH8I8YbpklZVdyDVkBrcsGAxw16t4DvcQT019585zZ4org/nI wCH5Rvn364VW+zUZmKruQm0VQfqbTla7BtB74mlNByn88v7tH0ebr6DxAKtSUOpRYe MlOzq98RCgXbt3K8bZpb0SlMTrzWMmO+xOPqYNJgXYxqXVMWpeikFzRL/adgqdi5vp W0O/SLhSmiHTG0bAsGzYbMjXufuluchNd5WNFLlK+fJvHIrEhqtemlfAQycpwwuZtK OM8eYXVN7G53tn8x7ivWd4gf/koOlDBT5Z0yGM4EqqaHeAePdDbW/5cIVd5SwaYkIW RdLvv07xJC/Bw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf report: Add --progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260929201524.2507733-3-acme@kernel.org> References: <20260929201524.2507733-1-acme@kernel.org> <20260929201524.2507733-3-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:23:02 +0000 Message-Id: <20260929202302.8F7ED1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Processing a large session with stdio output gives no feedback about > which phase perf is in or how far along it is: ui_progress updates are > only shown by the TUI. Add --progress, installing a stdio backend > (ui/stdio/progress.c) that prints the phase title, percentage and > counts: >=20 > Processing events... [42.3%] 317M / 746M >=20 > Phases can be nested, so the backend tracks the ones started to > complete the right one on ui_progress__finish(); that requires > init()/finish() pairs, fixed in ordered-events.c and the pipe and > directory event processing. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260929201524.2507= 733-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D2