From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF611395D8C for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790767934; cv=none; b=tyAVOLLVjQoMRwBcKSKW88GIHmgM5OmspGSRd/QeYRazv8YJN8wG94to4yiiyCz0mnt9jyO5WQgxIFX2FUST00jaUrANsbhTyWIAlzK8z3TfvzqFaKHlyJIuMC0ikEoLF/qPm28mPgheyhgyhjrMijniN0fiZQIrzz4nX6ZZRqY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790767934; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9lgg8R+86JpnzNEwMvh+35qcVwdby2ywk3T7bfGFryA=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=q/znyPu5n4s2+XxNgUFw3mU3HenNVZR81bvhPcTOBpHl6OI+q4Uf0a1E1kCuRJC1BCOSL3F7IHHtzb8fIT+1Yr+YwQZQb1+z9u6dNkevgzgY2rH/unKUkhzT3CSrrkwOlo1oubpQgA7wl1VFi720vHrGrUzucwzea2YwZBEnLXc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IEsVhDqC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IEsVhDqC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42FED1F000FF; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:32:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790767933; bh=zvw1YZjclKjcW7ZQ6wRKSdSnH+2CUGPEYokLLgvZW9I=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=IEsVhDqCKbcn5Rm2tPwNXfWxV0ZWzzLl8cIeirY/Z1l1FS94lGu+gFTn/hUCqjodT FoCC+7PvmfhBpg6s+LlZSvtZNRUSGaqRKly1VGzPdL+0VBnh/DeXiRlUcN5+wan9Ql aDVtw/D1dNzgpEU3LM0FJXEwPnmFqDhkMtTaeoRvh7EGAodH8k4mRyXxnG/Y4FlmI3 GZIHN9TKDTwf30TI1EI1odvoGQKOh54C0XSnPtZhI5H8sOfuFNiNBcfUXnQaxzRSFV GZvWF6o4cpIUfbPnVqWgtA+6ntumVJOX1jQIfyUqM/pZK9W/3RljgL796I7ttKO3FB JIzxskBugNQJA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] perf report: Add --progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260930112454.16331-3-acme@kernel.org> References: <20260930112454.16331-1-acme@kernel.org> <20260930112454.16331-3-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:32:12 +0000 Message-Id: <20260930113213.42FED1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Processing a large session with stdio output gives no feedback about > which phase perf is in or how far along it is: ui_progress updates are > only shown by the TUI. Add --progress, installing a stdio backend > (ui/stdio/progress.c) that prints the phase title, percentage and > counts: >=20 > Processing events... [42.3%] 317M / 746M >=20 > Phases can be nested, so the backend tracks the ones started to > complete the right one on ui_progress__finish(); that requires > init()/finish() pairs, fixed in ordered-events.c and the pipe and > directory event processing. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260930112454.1633= 1-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D2