From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91EA73F20EC for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790805139; cv=none; b=SvL/T4GNq0U4CafCV/UXh4tB1QhxQS7IoHfj/76HJIMoCWjKVrwXRwmLbJIVyJmzm9Q97M9k93QYLWyt+45+5eS0B13H5Eh2sAaVC8JMQmsfvKeeHhDVrm8FTzrFCVISYrKiBKw4CfcNlnqs6wxthyaxf9bEFBrOPsSuru8PW+k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790805139; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n3WO1BD/gMkVYhI0rgWrwSR71it5gcgeITrWTXis0Fs=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=DBH2d8BHIfbHqNA3PJJstH1EXdRX2/gHmLW1y91XoqTXbU3DtU64xQN1verzKG+hY31mM9MVHDNYEJPy4C81zJMzdBLjQCo69o6UWOQ+14X4kBThI4GBNRExtqtiU65Fxm/TBzdU/ZdFFjzDnvZc3/ZPBY0FbHbNykDr9e0NEDs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oRT7kFeh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oRT7kFeh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 581D21F000FF; Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:52:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790805138; bh=AhuAZpRjZo3YhtPcyXdmiy4Ifu3AJ4ndudK2I0/xuAI=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=oRT7kFehq5986joYfDpIFtvOqn1ZEtaGLyki2KRBv+oUlfFjyCuXl2kZgriqJl8iZ ESxo+sD423JQJ2Ejyv6DfLbB/9SdiW9RoChSXNHdleq6UWcUKBXjsF3q3oGoAJDK9I /+2Auhuyymsmca3ZOZFtmlTm2dFYlB2zQVDPQ/rSqzsK9ctFtv0WA7ATKZ5HTeL5rr TGLIXGZ9ch89OWMTNrcmQsYpE9bgH+AbCdLJDrpRwwNlLurrOyeAjrsz5loSIPdHUG eqLX91qBfsWJ0YxhUja3uNLdsAjsL+PsWqnqjFWpmu+/gedb7RW6+qeiugxQLhrREw HEcqHiAim6ulg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] perf report: Add --progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260930213716.2633750-3-acme@kernel.org> References: <20260930213716.2633750-1-acme@kernel.org> <20260930213716.2633750-3-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:52:17 +0000 Message-Id: <20260930215218.581D21F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Processing a large session with stdio output gives no feedback about > which phase perf is in or how far along it is: ui_progress updates are > only shown by the TUI. Add --progress, installing a stdio backend > (ui/stdio/progress.c) that prints the phase title, percentage and > counts: >=20 > Processing events... [ 42.3%] 317M / 746M >=20 > Phases can be nested, so the backend tracks the ones started to > complete the right one on ui_progress__finish(); that requires > init()/finish() pairs, fixed in ordered-events.c and the pipe and > directory event processing. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260930213716.2633= 750-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D2