From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B18947141A for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 09:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790932393; cv=none; b=mry1GChQClo6Jar/8WJC1gSAxiAUnDk7FbLeSJBTGk7d87Y24Q6jVSKSJSSe1mPcLTi2moSkCpzrAmAOxEcfHulTQ6/zTEnTWMWNT8tHFfBHO4hhylWHNXuzS8VBWJZurDyQ23tAizrWQ/SsMex7hikX42YYyKeX8qdyCWZU1Vc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790932393; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rsiUwyq6tj78RwPudkwxPntBxnlvwnmBeGzPxIsQ0LM=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=azM/0GSobYQqubME7bqnQwwV1Hjz6+UQ0SA9VdAt4x0+SRHMWEoPKC9yzQADdUWHLZrJ5jH+lItbzoEwxYOh/uKbMkC764bphbEVY4kQ9eNXBykh/gwVLAnZ8oN2g4SaaIr3NUiTgs1y3dw4WI+SGqRm0BPPcrGs9icVB+4/Hr4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=IcIu4Ra5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="IcIu4Ra5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 230B81F00893; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 09:13:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790932392; bh=oazEZDcb08jNmSd6C+QJlMo1jw04QuRJ+eNYhu9KFk8=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=IcIu4Ra5gWkekO3iAoVUFLOLIDaH+h4zY5DVhr+tMG2Xr6UQ+HHfJKvXOMOGlon4V QiqiMcwx2ZR+GAJ79bKoqHGqI3wQyoM8RsWZv53swgNjaCBtkStzUd3bXhQx02Mwu/ G6VqyQX27BT+8SRc2262uurSZBInywOtjhVDwSqV3b9uYhLmaFO3mGgB6f6GA8VnMh DF5tt/FiM2Ij2PE5/4dC48BQfDucRibYe/QwsCyNzjiYlYWK0oJrijqZ8DASyopspQ qR5FXXb7KMZjRPuj0e7cx45QgenjY6tZKhmRBc1kRQVLsN7/055Ld5Co7s4Euej35Y l2+3WvFJO5JOA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/9] perf report: Add --progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261001185400.2754753-7-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261001185400.2754753-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261001185400.2754753-7-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:13:11 +0000 Message-Id: <20261002091312.230B81F00893@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Processing a large session with stdio output gives no feedback about > which phase perf is in or how far along it is: ui_progress updates are > only shown by the TUI. Add --progress, installing a stdio backend > (ui/stdio/progress.c) that prints the phase title, percentage and > counts: >=20 > Processing events... [ 42.3%] 317M / 746M >=20 > Phases can be nested, so the backend tracks the ones started to > complete the right one on ui_progress__finish(); that requires > init()/finish() pairs, fixed in ordered-events.c and the pipe and > directory event processing. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001185400.2754= 753-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D6