From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DB8047C0F2 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790936960; cv=none; b=VijcxKDgL4t3aV2/99PLeBBj1wkutXfRmnHDkpZDLUhzWcgJHevQjIFky6OpGf5UZxGj56lNUbdudegR5bYb/K60LRPdaZ9gR/oR55XvhESVoAMF1K6+EtUEDnXOHqpT955vVfealpP+Qrn9hsN660CkS5usmJuF7bpFjYS8D7E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790936960; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2OWYwVOo4z4/Apnlv34WwOg1MLp1Ab1JePLA+BtfYW0=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=h7BwNiHtw06P7+GAxChnscio5wkl7jbPUnT3OWHkEbEDfYY2m/aBpdW3IEdViULWwekvHjoSWcjmS8rK+C0FJzyUbIKkAJI8t4WRP456Ofe+3cR3b/y1tUefnlaFL3G/7AbcGF2W4oDGs5Ks/PbD+VNBsk7V87J4NlJZGZZmPc8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VGpoA7Rk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VGpoA7Rk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DF001F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:29:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790936958; bh=6nw2gaaScHVD76ds21zbs55Pv82jna1L7RQGuC8zcGw=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=VGpoA7Rkj+dx++4F7yLZ1thhA7OnRUjnhoW63TATN0zwxWuhlbn4xLYTprgMYfMt1 ff6ZWSKpb08Scs8OvNC+ciEimpTXH+IceIy/DB/i5ON0TcmD/8CojmeflYUhDMSKS0 hWTAqNxHUKSfHiXWzrxbAme2nr6qlF7E/ymd/x/4vniQUFx+ZRqmD7Pbuwiudqydu0 RGi3qgG2kDh+7C4u7PVusDIp+ZFaRWZAJnSrBkePUi5UuXvhyYMYmKBR45qiigbmXZ tVEefIo4doxPFrZUBy2qv+Fs5rsE1E+CjyJDGzb4ol/KspY6SSCXXllMM0v6y2yR+r mzeVsSOiOpYxw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] perf report: Add --progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261002102110.27587-7-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261002102110.27587-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261002102110.27587-7-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:29:17 +0000 Message-Id: <20261002102918.7DF001F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Processing a large session with stdio output gives no feedback about > which phase perf is in or how far along it is: ui_progress updates are > only shown by the TUI. Add --progress, installing a stdio backend > (ui/stdio/progress.c) that prints the phase title, percentage and > counts: >=20 > Processing events... [ 42.3%] 317M / 746M >=20 > Phases can be nested, so the backend tracks the ones started to > complete the right one on ui_progress__finish(); that requires > init()/finish() pairs, fixed in ordered-events.c and the pipe and > directory event processing. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261002102110.2758= 7-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D6