From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 419A347DD6E for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790937002; cv=none; b=as/taSib2NRwWz5dAnCJlJUzX1sEnFkMtvdXjTTLG7yKZTNY227KeJWdwnfF1qw2Ah2ZLJEQAedvRzMh8TKo5cy6AdjObexor9bCmM3VyP/9FMjdZsAeTB+RUryRSSWv31u2cjpHQg2lvtts4XDEpS9A16P2iTpDV1z2c2MFetE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790937002; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sRbpjdRaqRCYHbw49CUcQazI/wWt6O4g2fLtaOUw2ss=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=fJtCVc3xmyt5UGXbkVS5Eg3rGQWcf6rJcQzPcs6Elx6+gfiahso9xT7wwQURr3w5fh5pOmz59QH8EjZrQAlqRwS+sirgkHERrQnYisHNQnxhJmvHaktlvVmrpqBlbCIkpoHIgLxL5f+i74jymQAnywvR3r0IRF6AwJ+7XRtjwKI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RH1v20xE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RH1v20xE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A55431F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:30:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790937000; bh=PtgFv+l9q/quDVU/DZ2krZsk/ceMsD5gpRN6TkyVcu8=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=RH1v20xEPDr4JMfma+5EEpC91/fKMpTUvII6wDgANTgv6ZaQD3ppuT45TfjA6aRFU Bg6WS+17w7pksXn++8bGyRfR1zcBBUJZOHZ48bie2W3U0MAeWlAsX6PsJ5CnmNxSNH SAeclp1Iny3s9fGqolCwmj/hysxpJnfI6fssfdJQD/OoaAcM5F/Onxw9JI0t71lvTF w/reR2sC8B3Aeay9I6XTJc6W8xGrgsdY7B9VrEbqtNbFuM+OZ9qn1TfEoNDZcuoj0A aYwGRMSogmaSgzu5HvHIpsveGNgYT/YivuEN48ONT4k7KdTmvDwrTYX8RD8G8s4xHK yNtZlukd9gA9Q== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/9] perf report: Add --no-progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261002102110.27587-8-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261002102110.27587-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261002102110.27587-8-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:30:00 +0000 Message-Id: <20261002103000.A55431F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Now that --progress is being added for the stdio case, wire up its > counterpart for the browsers: the TUI and GTK ones present progress of > their own and there is no way to turn it off. Install the no-op > ui_progress ops, the ones already used until a backend sets theirs, > after setup_browser() installed the ones of the browser in use. >=20 > The phases are still counted, nothing is shown for them, and no second > option is needed for it: parse-options provides --no-progress as the > negation of --progress, report.progress_set saying that it was asked > for, report.progress being false both when nothing was asked for and > when --no-progress was. >=20 > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261002102110.2758= 7-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D7