From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33BA83A1B5 for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 06:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791094271; cv=none; b=ntyVXIySgK3AT9hUWTGhKnQjqnrs+2+mJa6Qo7qJfH1RBdgcvDtZLdwyXpJd1+2IYvTtAePqYfmhkWks0LyUNZVkZJsLkJXy4bWe/Ai2Xj+cv+YGtrBCAoSOZ4mW44zERzupsHgjr+ptKzvkXzGfumx8DtDSiEGp14ec8G4WN5c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791094271; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e/WOcc5YwzUrzaZUa0B0/DFnb4S++PTFdHm0aYCqyIw=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=glFAdmfHCl5CSSvE23j4/lu0K8kqVeyih495jBZiLnIBNFsD6NvnB+KOHcx7TA5ksE0egMPavjkdW3P39eUhXQR7MGpjzanxKquVk8HjV75eN4syrSAGnddrNc1ZfK8s5mgDyBghi4mSnimRIpLav/ZZFdHqB4jW5fdqJ4+ZBp4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RCrV9E0l; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RCrV9E0l" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86B801F000FF; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 06:11:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791094269; bh=ELuI+GhlApX/KgrpCYxMW+YDChXPcNvN6z2BuuECFlc=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=RCrV9E0leB/atiGMPBz/RcDc3L3pZkfkDpkeOTv/nFEIBTPg1G9xi/dXlIWV+ofEP zwbetDNcBS2O7EYd/41tCAsCSpl/2sk7wbeeAlvmxc1jCZvDwG+CaBEaRVL9K+Nfsz NJiWaLSqS+TZz+Hho2D2f9sNVrAAtGi1Mf9lVBChkmiAa7KH/wddQJnjfwfjamT+MZ ebWNoQsB9Rwxjwqqq3U0iJ9uWXyqWSA3gWVuxMacDmHJfvs7CRgcwZ5btXqqsncqJ3 rWQ8oLsoQOrOoEdJjrZ3br5Fk0svm1HNQv34ipjNqyxsyfnLYB1QD9qbDNFfGq3CBz m1Bd4FEGGwkoQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/9] perf report: Add --no-progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261004060457.3353-8-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261004060457.3353-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261004060457.3353-8-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 06:11:09 +0000 Message-Id: <20261004061109.86B801F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Now that --progress is being added for the stdio case, wire up its > counterpart for the browsers: the TUI and GTK ones present progress of > their own and there is no way to turn it off. Install the no-op > ui_progress ops, the ones already used until a backend sets theirs, > after setup_browser() installed the ones of the browser in use. The > phases are still counted, nothing is shown for them, and no second > option is needed for it: parse-options provides --no-progress as the > negation of --progress, report.progress_set saying that it was asked > for, report.progress being false both when nothing was asked for and > when --no-progress was. >=20 > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004060457.3353= -1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D7