From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 372D332B12C for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 06:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791094341; cv=none; b=WuRh9/P5lDdOpo1zu7dUnQec+S67IdwbYYgNL7xPnIifRxXT9+CXfVyX7UQua5IvamEdK/dVxTv9liuJH8SL9YlARVLYYygl0+vCB0F2SzYOcZeGrnt5p3HtWnVBzp8rtt40vktEPCc61HlgT6bd7DEtVYGC7ppTMTT3P11IFxU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791094341; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZsmemU33cKuLEyWNs+BXfsugxQiiCJl2jMUIslZE0Cg=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=rHKQSiemjRMJIA3xu+n/r64ljrEs68Ra/TooyhAFj/wv+jZmcMeGYTzDEhLUL5hSpCBe+kUDpHp6GQBlwTtQjT9TQZthhhrLuWG10uJHnzOO2PadA8yrbnU1VWZs68i9/5D9jEO8YXbrfuj9zkw+d9Z0TRxMA/5VhvrRmXn5C6I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=K8RcJxa9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="K8RcJxa9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F220F1F000FF; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 06:12:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791094340; bh=YC8f9p7wKbEskkUQIiVzfbHJ6ZtSt9GWUzNlv9/GiFM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=K8RcJxa9brg1oCzc7SaThClNzwdIfsuno2bFSmvX8B0bgSKSiToipmE7cRgh6ymem SQpdbT0qCi2HR+d935TpedLq4U1EHwZWUHFDWVo+Tb43ChqDbMT+S+SqyuOw098S65 70IZPS85xXob6uQiJXjawLe0NYdtbag859OJh5KSKcY82i4cVB4i0ZaHZubbYWwTKJ x7D4ruNMbMW8ywjR9nif6Fj6xPrchQEsek2i1rD/JPbHjCfkfTHFIJBxVK8T1XMMag ioGISoWVAF3bif4jjXl2iXD+NlfRMY9aXZi54CJITPM69Z0Qfq6CTVE2Hv6BuMX/VM +Ra49n4M94s0A== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/9] perf report: Add --progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261004060457.3353-7-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261004060457.3353-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261004060457.3353-7-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 06:12:19 +0000 Message-Id: <20261004061219.F220F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Processing a large session with stdio output gives no feedback about > which phase perf is in or how far along it is: ui_progress updates are > only shown by the TUI. Add --progress, installing a stdio backend > (ui/stdio/progress.c) that prints the phase title, percentage and > counts: >=20 > Processing events... [ 42.3%] 317M / 746M >=20 > Phases can be nested, so the backend tracks the ones started to > complete the right one on ui_progress__finish(); that requires > init()/finish() pairs, fixed in ordered-events.c and the pipe and > directory event processing. >=20 > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004060457.3353= -1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D6