From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87DE423A9B for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 10:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791109777; cv=none; b=f5gNQiz4u4uf5s2dqO1BVxk801x18igD21AYA/dGc07Re5AvH0cyCdruCp6rB7Jp/I7xOdbgp0RN5rIRy321PWwW9alaLcYvt7VtkBhu3K/sL76UANMFqjGonsHv587dPYwgk/7iTYshYo9GrxLg2SKR+xSvwy2xOEl6nbuPs80= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791109777; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EDinh8giU1IagBX+rWabLdgwX/V7QKoT7YIeEjhfhrE=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=nMfrBSloPYwmfuAPRdsqp4jpkIO1O3yXfvxIcb9aSlIqlHMRUXnAeIfepFjcimdmTxgDySGHW9q6vW4KDi+0PIo+qGW1VNv///+/mjdATIhGdsB7lh8x6ZPqqiGX+n7SbeLpaVLpGtY/z4K7MWLwSIiT5A5XyjQ6DlxUbagBXOM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZcBrmpXK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZcBrmpXK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6FC41F000FF; Sun, 4 Oct 2026 10:29:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791109775; bh=8moA3zpOupV51I9QDjhPvBVcRZl1PP5CnNPK1YWzIOs=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ZcBrmpXKqdGQvf7NPC3yID6lL07n+Hb4D7+SiIwubXjMKJbV8Gt3J/QL9dZwD5P8r dvRtXN70gZ7HDd15Lvmfx+F1c5HvNkal7coNBNRQ6xrdhm2RhLzRw+EgE7kAKs2XDi +sISge9k4G8Bbsj9Sl57Xmb5bptrKL2a1Y9x6noSHDbjTlZGYHpz9RVVJRuMaYNXzF pP/yNeABP095QXM0KHQtPkPSa9PRFDyphp3f1EzWxngztAR8zw6tAvxA5i8retErCW i/rlJ5okOD2Bud5TFK8RMWuKGbGbjnVz5oJtw0tbgtz0eye22i/tY5LXlLCIq3cRPa iNqAp0mh0LStA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] perf report: Add --no-progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261004102133.26392-8-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261004102133.26392-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261004102133.26392-8-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 10:29:34 +0000 Message-Id: <20261004102934.E6FC41F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Now that --progress is being added for the stdio case, wire up its > counterpart for the browsers: the TUI and GTK ones present progress of > their own and there is no way to turn it off. Install the no-op > ui_progress ops, the ones already used until a backend sets theirs, > after setup_browser() installed the ones of the browser in use. The > phases are still counted, nothing is shown for them, and no second > option is needed for it: parse-options provides --no-progress as the > negation of --progress, report.progress_set saying that it was asked > for, report.progress being false both when nothing was asked for and > when --no-progress was. >=20 > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004102133.2639= 2-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D7