From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kunwu Chan" <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf/core: add KUnit tests for AUX kernel-consumer API
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2026 17:45:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004174520.8BE771F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261004173458.837842-4-kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] perf: double free of perf_event in aux_test_create_event()
- [Medium] perf: memory leak of AUX pages on KUnit assertion failure
--
commit 5c8a187a6ddc0c41bba18676f8fced4749f18392
Author: Lian Wang <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
perf/core: add KUnit tests for AUX kernel-consumer API
This commit adds a KUnit test suite for the perf AUX kernel-consumer API.
It registers a self-contained dummy AUX PMU and includes 39 test cases to
cover the setup, release, and data copying lifecycle.
> diff --git a/kernel/events/aux_kernel_test.c b/kernel/events/aux_kernel_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/events/aux_kernel_test.c
[ ... ]
> +static struct perf_event *aux_test_create_event(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct perf_event_attr attr = {};
> + struct perf_event *event;
> +
> + attr.type = dummy_aux_pmu_type;
> + attr.size = sizeof(attr);
> + attr.disabled = 1;
> +
> + event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, raw_smp_processor_id(),
> + NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(event))
> + return event;
> +
> + if (kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, aux_test_event_release, event)) {
> + perf_event_release_kernel(event);
[Severity: Medium]
Will this cause a double free of the event object?
If kunit_add_action_or_reset() fails, it automatically executes the cleanup
action, which in this case is aux_test_event_release(). That callback
already invokes perf_event_release_kernel() on the event. Calling it a
second time explicitly in this error path appears to trigger a double free.
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + }
> +
> + return event;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static void test_user_kernel_coexistence(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct perf_event *ev_a = aux_test_create_event(test);
> + struct perf_event *ev_b = aux_test_create_event(test);
> + struct perf_output_handle handle_a, handle_b;
> + unsigned long a_head_before, b_head_before;
> + void *addr;
> + int ret;
[ ... ]
> + /* Simulate userspace ownership: swap refcounts on B's rb.
> + * perf_mmap() would set aux_mmap_count=1 for a userspace event.
> + */
> + refcount_set(&ev_b->rb->aux_mmap_count, 1);
> + refcount_set(&ev_b->rb->aux_kernel_count, 0);
> +
> + /* Produce on A — B's head stays 0 */
> + addr = perf_aux_output_begin(&handle_a, ev_a);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, addr);
[Severity: Medium]
Does this leak the AUX pages if the assertion fails?
If this assertion or subsequent assertions fail while aux_kernel_count is
set to 0, the test will immediately abort and skip the manual refcount
restoration at the end of the function.
When KUnit runs the deferred cleanup action aux_test_event_release() on
abort, perf_event_release_aux() observes that aux_kernel_count is 0 and
returns early without tearing down the buffer, leaving the memory
permanently leaked.
> + perf_aux_output_end(&handle_a, 512);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261004173458.837842-1-kunwu.chan@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-04 17:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-04 17:34 [PATCH 0/5] perf/core: add AUX buffer kernel-consumer API Kunwu Chan
2026-10-04 17:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf/core: add AUX buffer ownership for kernel events Kunwu Chan
2026-10-04 17:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 17:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf/core: add AUX ring accessors for kernel consumers Kunwu Chan
2026-10-04 17:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 17:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf/core: add KUnit tests for AUX kernel-consumer API Kunwu Chan
2026-10-04 17:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-04 17:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] selftests/perf_events: add userspace AUX regression test Kunwu Chan
2026-10-04 17:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 17:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests/perf_events: add AUX kernel API selftest script Kunwu Chan
2026-10-04 17:45 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261004174520.8BE771F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kunwu.chan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox