From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFC4149C4A5 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:05:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791299126; cv=none; b=sGUS8EPaV/LIRnDIe7flneXNWXg252bf/tul67Z+xcD9wKEHYXqaGxaYydoEqK4yjfuJkK8ixjTAx2xV+DIIeAGxhs4PbfArCCFOm+UbEmoJNHweLVQ8kMcpUAGjhof91QUzNPgYSt3EBDmCfGWc3idy1awrbpakQ9pZWLh3BwE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791299126; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PYO+cBhgTaZjE9LNfVZSaF2Nz7WkYYbLUrhV88r66E4=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=SGu1cIMfebDZt3oqHjJVKdQT39gnxXUcWJaKLtyDkhrGqg0vF+sIJundb4sRTRnM5ZqBJwxKGiV5XiX2a7rY0vhfzo0TTGKyhc++Ug5wsn5ws87cemmixxbVzPcnY2AaX85leL4Io71x8RCAbkBml8hn5YDdN9s/Wd6HScBcLPM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=neWfDeJK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="neWfDeJK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 534CD1F0089B; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:05:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791299125; bh=OYeK0uaqMqnZZbRCv1kWWno6a0hW7nENweLgg3Gkjps=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=neWfDeJKlgvPwpDs4KX6V+FvXun9GwaiDabv4ntC6omu+PLsvoaS39upm1zaDNrBY 73a8SOpsRmEsJUscuRw8vaFaljYJVIYNhDAj7EnXq9UOZJcLcxecxxar735R1uhYZQ NRzgEd1UW7jwUHRD6v4p182rtt8CA/mqYCT1XS1Qe80wvNf3Ina5HRRsMK3zEF+oAZ dHBVEYTYtnnMCFm6Fp33uvftcsd8Cis0UZm2jxkAC3VGzbj69MRsoc/LVTGrK5R1T8 noXHH2Jsp8w+oJahqyGy42byGCoHDEC4TMBF0Z3SCJ8eCzBOSID72zL2OV601zE2Op NPig98clH+EoQ== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] perf report: Add --no-progress option Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20261006145729.3028247-8-acme@kernel.org> References: <20261006145729.3028247-1-acme@kernel.org> <20261006145729.3028247-8-acme@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 15:05:24 +0000 Message-Id: <20261006150525.534CD1F0089B@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >=20 > Now that --progress is being added for the stdio case, wire up its > counterpart for the browsers: the TUI and GTK ones present progress of > their own and there is no way to turn it off. Install the no-op > ui_progress ops, the ones already used until a backend sets theirs, > after setup_browser() installed the ones of the browser in use. The > phases are still counted, nothing is shown for them, and no second > option is needed for it: parse-options provides --no-progress as the > negation of --progress, report.progress_set saying that it was asked > for, report.progress being false both when nothing was asked for and > when --no-progress was. >=20 > Suggested-by: Namhyung Kim > Assisted-by: LLM > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261006145729.3028= 247-1-acme@kernel.org?part=3D7