From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8B044C33F9; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 14:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792334383; cv=none; b=sTO9oZjNMrzJ9YDlVZL97b10aySzA9VW0osEh1X/OtytHOfi+KGq72iQqVNPH6HmFHunE2GyigLz5BOzjj+vPuAbKr8iG5iFIwwcWv39DdNocYV1RR1dRPe0qclW6wR4SiFrblhdzN5owWgZR9yK+Uw5mQMtax7ew9dvppVjtvc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1792334383; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PAfjW3xcpiCaHXV7/iUqTMYnxKrH/q5uQYs+RSCe+wQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=eFeFn7jMKfiBr4zlnBPbIkLN9/4RRH5t4w7qcYJnuAGSLdT5+y+ZGCeQ+nPr2QH0gud3vWaBse7PKlMTHDooqUzTaav3Aj0fg3i/QgBqFKwhnR9PtljA51BzlEeCwCsjV3DfTGCaczd7RNfmn907TpaHByfgR6gMdA1/AFR8vWA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WuUYdnrR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WuUYdnrR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 831F81F000C4; Sun, 18 Oct 2026 14:39:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1792334382; bh=ze4neFQXilKWVkV1JOWiiZvoobvoNiFOFy6OOiKZYSM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=WuUYdnrRY8wDlUtF/ZoukMeg7MH/2GbG3CAffRWphV7LzsETdchMvTcDXsZ1/jOKz izgTOvJSZM+LbG5kSjv/bDi34SkqmJwGnAClR7nyWo83tPVpOSNQNUCaIeBDOjqjCV 2umv9Vc7NFHK5mb7qz9SFqQ4isGQTsIVxtad9uH0BujDfQe6Gn6LTXkbiP2E8Luh2X isZv3+kKBPDGIopNm4ee7eVTkYlCfB1qQODVa/9/fRadp+ODJvKEOdI6nMt9SPhJtD bhuc7ToHbEkXgE2TTWTPKjsYibR7/Esw3GVKAvpSygWN4xmMwKuc2HHUTnS0gqmygh mOvzaALCxkm9w== From: Sasha Levin To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: Nathan Chancellor , Nicolas Schier , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] kbuild: factor the userspace ABI flags out into KBUILD_USERABI Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2026 10:39:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20261018143939.4113153-1-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20261016143143.3613501-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20261016143143.3613501-2-sashal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Sat, Oct 17, 2026 at 02:32:08PM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: >[Severity: Low] >Does this new exported variable also need to be added to the SPDX SBOM >environment allowlist? > >Currently, KBUILD_USERCFLAGS and KBUILD_USERLDFLAGS are explicitly tracked >in KERNEL_BUILD_VARIABLES_ALLOWLIST in scripts/sbom/sbom/environment.py: [...] >Leaving KBUILD_USERABI off this list means its value will not be captured >in the SPDX SBOM generated by scripts/sbom, resulting in incomplete build >metadata documentation for the userspace ABI configuration. KBUILD_USERABI is appended to both KBUILD_USERCFLAGS and KBUILD_USERLDFLAGS, which are on that list, so its flags are already in the SBOM. Listing it as well would only record the same flags again. -- Thanks, Sasha