Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Stefan Kerkmann <s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de>,
	Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] vdso: Add VDSO_UNALIGNED_PACKED config option for ARMv5
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:51:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261020165101.5e74ab2d@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-nice-turquoise-dinosaur-3079bc-mkl@pengutronix.de>

On Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:56:40 +0200
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:

> On 20.10.2026 10:24:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > FYI: there is the kconfig Symbol HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. Can we
> > > make use of it?  
> 
> Just noticed that sashiko's review contained the same remark, but the
> bot only posts to the linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org list, where I'm
> not subscribed:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/sashiko-outbox-178182@kernel.org/
> 
> > That would be better, but I still hope we can just get back to the
> > portable code across all architectures for the in-kernel version.
> >
> > I have one more request for you: can you check /proc/cpu/alignment
> > on the system that shows the performance regression with and without
> > the patch?  
> 
> When booted via NFS-root to the login prompt, we have about 570k System
> alignment fixups, all in the IP stack: :/
> 
> __udp4_lib_rcv+0x78/0xc6c
> icmpv6_echo_reply+0x160/0x504
> ip_send_unicast_reply+0xf0/0x3f8
> ndisc_send_skb+0x15c/0x40c
> rawv6_recvmsg+0x114/0x3b4
> tcp_rcv_established+0x3ec/0xba0
> tcp_v4_fill_cb+0x70/0xec
> tcp_validate_incoming+0x540/0x868
> 
> Comparing v7.0.12 with mainline "unaligned.h" and reverting commit
> a339671db64b ("vdso: Switch get/put_unaligned() from packed struct to
> memcpy()") brings no difference with respect to alignment problems. But
> I see the increase in I/O performance (measured with "fio" [1]) on a
> UBIFS/NAND file system:

So the nand fs is hit by the memcpy() but there are misaligned transfers
in the network stack.
 
> - v7.0.12 NFS root
>   User:           0
>   System:         573956 (tcp_measure_rcv_mss+0xe4/0x1e0)

I can't find __udp_lib_rcv(), but that looks like it could be from expanding
tcp_flag_word(tcp_hdr(skb)).
Which would rather imply that the network driver isn't correctly aligning
all receive packets (honouring NET_IP_ALIGN).

When I were a lad the kernel just paniced and userspace core dumped :-)

David

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-20 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-19 20:12 [PATCH v1 1/2] vdso: Add VDSO_UNALIGNED_PACKED config option for ARMv5 Ian Rogers
2026-10-19 20:12 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] tools headers: Update the vdso/unaligned.h copy with the kernel sources Ian Rogers
2026-10-19 20:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-19 20:39 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] vdso: Add VDSO_UNALIGNED_PACKED config option for ARMv5 sashiko-bot
2026-10-19 22:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-20  6:44   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-20  8:24     ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-20  8:41       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-20  9:06         ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-20 14:56       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-20 15:51         ` David Laight [this message]
2026-10-20 15:54         ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-20 14:00 ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261020165101.5e74ab2d@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.kerkmann@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox