From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: Perf Users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: perf report --inline usability issues when sorting by function
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 00:03:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2212711.UdkHn3vGHL@agathebauer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13103005.TJTgFMaJPi@agathebauer>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4750 bytes --]
On Donnerstag, 27. April 2017 23:09:10 CEST Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey Jin, others
>
> I observe a usability issue with the following example code:
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> #include <cmath>
> #include <random>
> #include <iostream>
>
> using namespace std;
>
> int main()
> {
> uniform_real_distribution<double> uniform(-1E5, 1E5);
> default_random_engine engine;
> double s = 0;
> for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; ++i) {
> s += uniform(engine);
> }
> cout << "random sum: " << s << '\n';
> return 0;
> }
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Compile it with `g++ -O2 -g` then record it with `perf record --call-graph
> dwarf` and inspect the data with inliners enabled. Here are some excerpts
> that show the issues:
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> $ perf report --stdio --inline --no-children
> Failed to open [ext4], continuing without symbols
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only
> options.
> #
> #
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 499 of event 'cycles'
> # Event count (approx.): 329354953
> #
> # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> # ........ ......... ................. ................................
> #
> 96.70% ex_random ex_random [.] main
>
> ---main
> __libc_start_main
> _start
>
> 0.96% ex_random ld-2.25.so [.] do_lookup_x
>
> ---do_lookup_x
> _dl_lookup_symbol_x
> _dl_relocate_object
> dl_main
> _dl_sysdep_start
> _dl_start
> _dl_start_user
>
> 0.30% ex_random ld-2.25.so [.] _dl_lookup_symbol_x
> ...
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Note how no inlined frames are actually shown. I think the issue here is
> that when we group by function name (the default), then multiple samples
> with different IPs will get merged. Once we display the data then in e.g.
> ui/stdio/ hist.c, we will only have one node left for this function, with
> an arbitrary IP (of the first sample, I guess).
>
> This is problematic, because depending on the IP, different inlined call
> stacks may have been used. This is observable for the above use-case by
> changing the grouping algorithm, e.g.:
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> $ perf report --stdio --inline --no-children -g srcline
> Invalid callchain mode: srcline
> Invalid callchain order: srcline
> Failed to open [ext4], continuing without symbols
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only
> options.
> #
> #
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 499 of event 'cycles'
> # Event count (approx.): 329354953
> #
> # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> # ........ ......... ................. ................................
> #
> 96.70% ex_random ex_random [.] main
>
> |--28.97%--main random.tcc:3326
> |
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:185 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1818 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1809 (inline)
> | /home/milian/projects/kdab/training-material/addon/
>
> profiling/build/ex_random/../../ex_random/main.cpp:13 (inline)
>
> | __libc_start_main
> | _start
> |
> |--28.14%--main random.h:143
> |
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:151 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:332 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.tcc:3332 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:185 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1818 (inline)
> | /usr/include/c++/6.3.1/bits/random.h:1809 (inline)
> | /home/milian/projects/kdab/training-material/addon/
>
> profiling/build/ex_random/../../ex_random/main.cpp:13 (inline)
>
> | __libc_start_main
> | _start
>
> ...
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Has anyone any suggestion on how to fix this? Some ideas:
>
> - adapt the function aggregation to also take the inlined function into
> account
> - always add inlined frames to the graph
> - keep all IPs and their cost even when aggregating functions
I have no implemented the first option from the above list and sent a patch
for review. Feedback welcome! It seems to work quite nicely in my tests.
Thanks
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5903 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-27 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-27 21:09 perf report --inline usability issues when sorting by function Milian Wolff
2017-04-27 22:03 ` Milian Wolff [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2212711.UdkHn3vGHL@agathebauer \
--to=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).