linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] generate full callchain cursor entries for inlined frames
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 20:36:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2384048.5gd4jAH0Hk@agathebauer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170524150237.GA27760@danjae.aot.lge.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3962 bytes --]

On Mittwoch, 24. Mai 2017 17:02:37 CEST Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 03:42:59PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:46:04 PM CEST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > On Monday, May 22, 2017 11:06:43 AM CEST Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > Why not making the fake symbol has start addr of the sample IP and
> > > > length of 1.  The histogram sort code also compares the sym->start
> > > > which might confuse the output of the children mode too IMHO.
> > > 
> > > I can try that out, thank you for the suggestion. But I think it can
> > > easily
> > > break in different ways. I.e. when the same inline function gets used at
> > > different IPs, it should actually be considered to be the same function
> > > when we group/merge/aggregate. I updated the `match_chain` function
> > > accordingly, to do a symname / srcline comparison on inlined frames,
> > > instead of relying on the symbol start/end. I think using the IP for
> > > the fake symbols won't be more reliable here, don't you think?
> > > 
> > > In the end, I think we'll always have to special-case inlined fake
> > > symbols
> > > when we aggregate data, since the sym start/end is always going to be
> > > some
> > > arbitrary value that may or may not be what we want it to be. Doing the
> > > explicit comparison on e.g. srcline/symname is always going to be the
> > > most
> > > reliable option, as it also directly results in a proper aggregation
> > > based
> > > on the strings that the user will see in the end.
> > 
> > I haven't yet tried it out, but I think I can come up with a way to break
> > your approach easily. Assume the following pseudo-code:
> > 
> > void tail()
> > {
> > 
> >     instr1; // IP1
> >     instr2; // IP2
> > 
> > }
> > 
> > void mid()
> > {
> > 
> >     tail();
> > 
> > }
> > 
> > void main()
> > {
> > 
> >     mid();
> > 
> > }
> > 
> > Now, assume both `tail` and `mid` get inlined into `main`. If we get one
> > sample each for both IP1 and IP2, we want the following merged structure
> > if we merge based on symbol:
> > 
> > sym  | incl | self
> > main | 2    | 0
> > mid  | 2    | 0
> > tail | 2    | 2
> > 
> > If we would give the inlined fake-symbols a start of the IP, i.e. either
> > IP1 or IP2, then we would end up with this (unexpected) behavior instead:
> > 
> > sym  | incl | self
> > main | 2    | 0
> > mid  | 1    | 0
> > mid  | 1    | 0
> > tail | 1    | 1
> > tail | 1    | 1
> > 
> > The reason is that the fake symbols for the inlined frames would be
> > considered to be different functions since their start/end are not equal.
> > This is "wrong" in my eyes - we really have to do symbol name comparisons
> > for inlined frames, and also include srcline if that is desired.
> 
> That would depend on how we treat inlined function instances.  Each
> instance might be considered as same or not - but I think it'd be
> better treating them as same for simplicity.
> 
> Also currently perf aggregates samples using symbol name, but a new
> sort key might be added to use symbol address later.  Thus it'd be
> better to be prepared for such change.
> 
> > If you think the above is not a valid assessment, I'll try to change my
> > patch series to use the IP + 1 trick you suggest. But I really don't
> > think it's going to work.
> 
> So I agree that we should do symbol name comparison, but I still
> prefer setting fake symbol address to [IP, +1].  That would reduce
> memory space for annotate as well.

Can you expand on this? I can implement this, but without having a way to test 
I don't know whether I'm doing it right or not ;-)

Note that fake symbols cannot be annotated from `perf report` currently. The 
browser just does nothing - no error, nothing. So I'm really unsure how this 
would influence the "memory space for annotate".

Thanks

-- 
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5903 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-29 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-18 19:34 [PATCH 0/7] generate full callchain cursor entries for inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-05-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf report: remove code to handle inline frames from browsers Milian Wolff
2017-05-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf util: take elf_name as const string in dso__demangle_sym Milian Wolff
2017-05-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf report: create real callchain entries for inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-05-22 12:19   ` Namhyung Kim
2017-05-24 11:41     ` Milian Wolff
2017-05-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf report: use srcline from " Milian Wolff
2017-05-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf report: fall-back to function name comparison for -g srcline Milian Wolff
2017-05-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf report: mark inlined frames in output by " (inlined)" suffix Milian Wolff
2017-05-22 12:48   ` Namhyung Kim
2017-05-24 11:46     ` Milian Wolff
2017-06-03 13:51     ` Milian Wolff
2017-06-06  1:33       ` Namhyung Kim
2017-06-06  7:26         ` Milian Wolff
2017-06-06 19:52           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-05-18 19:34 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf script: mark inlined frames and do not print DSO for them Milian Wolff
2017-05-22 12:11   ` Namhyung Kim
2017-05-24 11:40     ` Milian Wolff
2017-05-18 20:05 ` [PATCH 0/7] generate full callchain cursor entries for inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-05-22  9:06   ` Namhyung Kim
2017-05-24 11:46     ` Milian Wolff
2017-05-24 13:42       ` Milian Wolff
2017-05-24 15:02         ` Namhyung Kim
2017-05-29 18:36           ` Milian Wolff [this message]
2017-05-30  1:33             ` Namhyung Kim
2017-05-22 12:09 ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2384048.5gd4jAH0Hk@agathebauer \
    --to=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).