linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] hwmon: Fix Intel Family-model checks to include extended Families
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:58:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <23e24c79-96ca-45da-832b-83a9b6456208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211194407.2577252-8-sohil.mehta@intel.com>

On 2/11/25 11:43, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * Return without adjustment if the Family isn't 6.
> +	 * The rest of the function assumes Family 6.
> +	 */
> +	if (c->x86 != 6)
> +		return tjmax;

Shouldn't we be converting this over to the vfm matches?

This is kinda icky:

> +	return family > 15 ||
> +	       (family == 6 &&
> +		model > 0xe &&
> +		model != 0x1c &&
> +		model != 0x26 &&
> +		model != 0x27 &&
> +		model != 0x35 &&
> +		model != 0x36);
>  }

I'm not sure how this escaped so far. Probably because it's not in arch/x86.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-11 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-11 19:43 [PATCH v2 00/17] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] x86/smpboot: Remove confusing quirk usage in INIT delay Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] x86/smpboot: Fix INIT delay optimization for extended Intel Families Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 20:10   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 20:20     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] x86/apic: Fix 32-bit APIC initialization " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] x86/cpu/intel: Fix the movsl alignment preference for extended Families Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 20:26   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 21:45     ` David Laight
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] x86/cpu/intel: Fix page copy performance " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 20:53   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-12  0:54     ` Andrew Cooper
2025-02-12 21:19       ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-13 23:02         ` Andrew Cooper
2025-02-14  0:29           ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] cpufreq: Fix the efficient idle check for Intel " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-12  5:35   ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-13 18:49     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-14  2:03       ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] hwmon: Fix Intel Family-model checks to include " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 20:58   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-02-11 21:38     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-12 13:43       ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-12 16:57         ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-14  2:23           ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-12 13:10     ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] x86/microcode: Update the Intel processor flag scan check Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:00   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] x86/mtrr: Modify a x86_model check to an Intel VFM check Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:00   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] x86/cpu/intel: Replace early Family 6 checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:03   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 15 " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:03   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 5 model " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:06   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] x86/pat: Replace Intel x86_model " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:09   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 21:42     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] x86/acpi/cstate: Improve Intel Family model checks Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:20   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] x86/cpu/intel: Bound the non-architectural constant_tsc " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:41   ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-12  0:45     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] perf/x86: Simplify P6 PMU initialization Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] perf/x86/p4: Replace Pentium 4 model checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=23e24c79-96ca-45da-832b-83a9b6456208@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).