From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE94C04A95 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 13:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232592AbiJYNRK (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:17:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232481AbiJYNRJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 09:17:09 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E89DCAF4; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 06:17:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1666703828; x=1698239828; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2F7Eoa9lBQCmf/5MvcL4NAHZcvTMNySoe8rV9kJTiZQ=; b=EgKuYrLTgcBzYTKWx/MyWkotI6T4BfMz/qyJ4eJUQz8RPCvW6PYWmgYX f00fonDagLQrkZHhfs/EyKS73skitojJSrjCiD5vKo4m9KGHjuxvCxwWR 4DemFSUTnfjduQqJl207weX1vxLsRfD/194zS5dOSKNya4DLPz3U9b6xw YWTjqA1v8RLqteocJ4Y2L2APLvaIwGmbU0d8pGlZSNX7EcjhmJ5dE7uCH cOwcQir+dso3CL2rhExBtDfvn/fdaYMqSMGpmCPt03LhWJKDUrtmmO7pc dNBZ2PxpIvw6jovGBGpc+ceLU2RJFZHCcZddWxGpdRs6yQzP/S6FvHv68 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10510"; a="371882989" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,212,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="371882989" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2022 06:17:08 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10510"; a="626417672" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,212,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="626417672" Received: from ahunter6-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.0.2.15]) ([10.252.45.236]) by orsmga007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2022 06:17:05 -0700 Message-ID: <243d2f33-258e-4bc2-326f-e74f39c6a714@intel.com> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 16:17:01 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0 Thunderbird/102.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] perf test: Use a test program in perf record tests Content-Language: en-US To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ian Rogers , Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org References: <20221020172643.3458767-1-namhyung@kernel.org> <20221020172643.3458767-4-namhyung@kernel.org> <960317d2-1bf8-cc2a-8772-8d0f5a136b6b@intel.com> From: Adrian Hunter Organization: Intel Finland Oy, Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki, Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4, Domiciled in Helsinki In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On 24/10/22 19:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 05:00:14PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: >> On 24/10/22 14:33, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>> Em Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 04:52:14PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu: >>>> I wonder if these utilities should just be built into perf to avoid >>>> the cc dependency. Perhaps we can have a hidden option built into >>>> perf test. > >>> Agreed, not depending on a compiler makes 'perf test' usable in more >>> systems, particularly production ones where we may want to check if perf >>> is passing all tests applicable to that system. > >> I haven't seen anyone package anything except the perf executable, so >> I presume the only people running these tests install the source, and >> so need a compiler anyway. > > Humm? > > [root@quaco ~]# head -3 /etc/os-release > NAME="Fedora Linux" > VERSION="36 (Workstation Edition)" > ID=fedora > [root@quaco ~]#G I guess I got confused - it seems it is only Ubuntu that does that.