From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] drivers/perf: arm_spe: Expose events capability
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 12:32:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3431e6e3-a80b-4ce0-94c4-56739a5ed2d9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613-arm_spe_support_hitm_overhead_v1_public-v1-2-6faecf0a8775@arm.com>
On 13/06/2025 4:53 pm, Leo Yan wrote:
> Expose an events entry in the caps folder to inform user space which
> events are valid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index be2ed326bb794d7e5dd1d6cfa89330753ced3ca5..b59c394b715bc49af0ae30c521f97813a046755d 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ enum arm_spe_pmu_capabilities {
> SPE_PMU_CAP_FEAT_MAX,
> SPE_PMU_CAP_CNT_SZ = SPE_PMU_CAP_FEAT_MAX,
> SPE_PMU_CAP_MIN_IVAL,
> + SPE_PMU_CAP_EVENTS,
> };
>
> static int arm_spe_pmu_feat_caps[SPE_PMU_CAP_FEAT_MAX] = {
> @@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pmu_feat_caps[SPE_PMU_CAP_FEAT_MAX] = {
> [SPE_PMU_CAP_ERND] = SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND,
> };
>
> -static u32 arm_spe_pmu_cap_get(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu, int cap)
> +static u64 arm_spe_pmu_cap_get(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu, int cap)
> {
> if (cap < SPE_PMU_CAP_FEAT_MAX)
> return !!(spe_pmu->features & arm_spe_pmu_feat_caps[cap]);
> @@ -133,6 +134,8 @@ static u32 arm_spe_pmu_cap_get(struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu, int cap)
> return spe_pmu->counter_sz;
> case SPE_PMU_CAP_MIN_IVAL:
> return spe_pmu->min_period;
> + case SPE_PMU_CAP_EVENTS:
> + return ~spe_pmu->pmsevfr_res0;
> default:
> WARN(1, "unknown cap %d\n", cap);
> }
> @@ -149,7 +152,7 @@ static ssize_t arm_spe_pmu_cap_show(struct device *dev,
> container_of(attr, struct dev_ext_attribute, attr);
> int cap = (long)ea->var;
>
> - return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", arm_spe_pmu_cap_get(spe_pmu, cap));
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", arm_spe_pmu_cap_get(spe_pmu, cap));
> }
>
> #define SPE_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(_name, _func, _var) \
> @@ -165,6 +168,7 @@ static struct attribute *arm_spe_pmu_cap_attr[] = {
> SPE_CAP_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(ernd, SPE_PMU_CAP_ERND),
> SPE_CAP_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(count_size, SPE_PMU_CAP_CNT_SZ),
> SPE_CAP_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(min_interval, SPE_PMU_CAP_MIN_IVAL),
> + SPE_CAP_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(events, SPE_PMU_CAP_EVENTS),
Would "event_filters" be a better name? Technically an SPE version can
support a filter but the event itself might not be implemented.
> NULL,
> };
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-13 15:53 [PATCH 00/12] perf arm-spe: Support new events in FEAT_SPEv1p4 Leo Yan
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 01/12] drivers/perf: arm_spe: Store event reserved bits in driver data Leo Yan
2025-06-19 11:28 ` James Clark
2025-06-19 16:22 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 02/12] drivers/perf: arm_spe: Expose events capability Leo Yan
2025-06-19 11:32 ` James Clark [this message]
2025-06-19 16:24 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf arm_spe: Correct setting remote access Leo Yan
2025-06-19 13:53 ` James Clark
2025-06-19 16:45 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf arm_spe: Directly propagate raw event Leo Yan
2025-06-19 14:13 ` James Clark
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf arm_spe: Decode event types for new features Leo Yan
2025-06-19 14:20 ` James Clark
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf arm_spe: Add "events" entry in meta data Leo Yan
2025-06-19 15:46 ` James Clark
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf arm_spe: Refine memory level filling Leo Yan
2025-06-20 10:27 ` James Clark
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf arm_spe: Separate setting of memory levels for loads and stores Leo Yan
2025-06-20 10:30 ` James Clark
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf arm_spe: Fill memory levels for FEAT_SPEv1p4 Leo Yan
2025-06-20 10:37 ` James Clark
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf arm_spe: Refactor arm_spe__get_metadata_by_cpu() Leo Yan
2025-06-20 10:45 ` James Clark
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf arm_spe: Set HITM flag Leo Yan
2025-06-20 10:51 ` James Clark
2025-06-13 15:53 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf arm_spe: Allow parsing both data source and events Leo Yan
2025-06-20 10:55 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3431e6e3-a80b-4ce0-94c4-56739a5ed2d9@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).