From: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-perf-use." <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
zvonko.kosic@de.ibm.com, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: perf report does not resolve symbols on s390x
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:05:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <371172f0-ecb9-c1c9-a478-e618c0f63c51@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170711190304.GH27350@kernel.org>
On 07/11/2017 09:03 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:17:25PM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu:
>> On 07/06/2017 02:35 PM, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
>>> On 07/05/2017 05:50 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
[...]
>> The fog has lifted and I found the root cause. Digging into machine__resolve was the
>> right hint...
>
>> What happens is this (short version)
>> machine__resolve has map and sym pointers ( al->map:0x32629190 al->sym:0x32776f40 )
>> --> sample__resolve_callchain al->map:0x32629190 al->sym:0x32776f40
>> --> thread__resolve_callchain al->map:0x32629190 al->sym:0x32776f40
>> --> thread__resolve_callchain_sample
>> creates a new struct addr_location to find the ip addr and its details.
>> --> add_callchain_ip (cpumode:2 --> user space address indicator)
>> --> thread__find_addr_map
>> this function can not resolve the address and as a last action
>> tries to resolve the address within kernel address space
>> --> machine__get_kernel_start
>
>> Now this function is interesting:
>
>> int machine__get_kernel_start(struct machine *machine)
>> {
>> struct map *map = machine__kernel_map(machine);
>> int err = 0;
>
>> /*
>> * The only addresses above 2^63 are kernel addresses of a 64-bit
>> * kernel. Note that addresses are unsigned so that on a 32-bit system
>> * all addresses including kernel addresses are less than 2^32. In
>> * that case (32-bit system), if the kernel mapping is unknown, all
>> * addresses will be assumed to be in user space - see
>> * machine__kernel_ip().
>> */
>> machine->kernel_start = 1ULL << 63;
>> if (map) {
>> err = map__load(map);
>> if (map->start)
>> machine->kernel_start = map->start;
>> }
>> return err;
>> }
>
>> It determines the kernel starts at address 1<<63 and loads the kernel address mapping.
>> On s390x
>> - The kernel starts at 0x0 (value of map->start) and thus all checks in function
>> thread__find_addr_map() fail and no symbol is found for the specified addresses
>> because the kernel starts at 0x8000000000000000. Which is wrong the kernel start at 0x0.
>
> Hi Thomas, really nice debugging session!
Thanks for the credit.... :-)
>
> I'm trying the one-liner below, Adrian, can you please check this and
> provide an ack? I think that that comment about the address that it will
> default when map__load() fails needs rewriting in light of Thomas
> comments about other arches (see further below)?
>
> I did a quick check of machine->kernel_start usage in Intel PT and since
> on x86 that assumption about partitioning the address space holds, no
> problem should be introduced by the one-liner fix, right?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index 5de2b86b9880..2e9eb6aa3ce2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -2209,7 +2209,7 @@ int machine__get_kernel_start(struct machine *machine)
> machine->kernel_start = 1ULL << 63;
> if (map) {
> err = map__load(map);
> - if (map->start)
> + if (!err)
> machine->kernel_start = map->start;
> }
> return err;
>
>
I like this patch. I have done a new build and removed all my debug output to start
from scratch. Without your patch I get this:
To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 4 of event 'cpu-clock'
# Event count (approx.): 1000000
#
# Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ........ ....... ................ ........................
#
75.00% 0.00% true [unknown] [k] 0x00000000004bedda
|
---0x4bedda
|
|--50.00%--0x42693a
| |
| --25.00%--0x2a72e0
| 0x2af0ca
| 0x3d1003fe4c0
|
--25.00%--0x4272bc
0x26fa84
and with your patch (I just rebuilt the perf tool, nothing else and used the same
perf.data file as input):
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 4 of event 'cpu-clock'
# Event count (approx.): 1000000
#
# Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ........ ....... .......................... ..................................
#
75.00% 0.00% true [kernel.vmlinux] [k] pgm_check_handler
|
---pgm_check_handler
do_dat_exception
handle_mm_fault
__handle_mm_fault
filemap_map_pages
|
|--25.00%--rcu_read_lock_held
| rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online
| 0x3d1003ff4c0
|
--25.00%--lock_release
Looks good to me....
>> --
>> Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM LTC Boeblingen Germany
>> --
>> Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
>> Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
>
--
Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM LTC Boeblingen Germany
--
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-12 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-05 14:45 perf report does not resolve symbols on s390x Thomas-Mich Richter
2017-07-05 15:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-06 7:23 ` Thomas-Mich Richter
2017-07-06 12:35 ` Thomas-Mich Richter
2017-07-07 12:17 ` Thomas-Mich Richter
2017-07-07 12:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-11 19:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-11 19:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-11 19:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-12 8:21 ` Thomas-Mich Richter
2017-07-12 10:40 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-12 14:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-13 12:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-12 9:05 ` Thomas-Mich Richter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=371172f0-ecb9-c1c9-a478-e618c0f63c51@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zvonko.kosic@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).