From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com,
tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@gmail.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/bugs: Declutter vulnerable CPU list
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 09:03:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39d1597a-d165-4f79-a2fc-d37fc2822909@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250306165757.sh6azitvazhq5lxj@desk>
On 3/6/25 08:57, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> As one of the goal of the patch is to shorten the macro names and follow
> the VULNWL_<> pattern, would it make sense to rename VULNWL_INTEL to:
>
> #define VULNWL_VFM(vfm, whitelist) \
> X86_MATCH_VFM(vfm, whitelist)
I don't think saving 6 characters justifies the extra level of
abstraction personally.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 7:12 [PATCH v6 0/5] Utilize cpu-type for CPU matching Pawan Gupta
2025-03-06 7:12 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/cpu: Name CPU matching macro more generically (and shorten) Pawan Gupta
2025-03-06 7:13 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] x86/cpu: Add cpu_type to struct x86_cpu_id Pawan Gupta
2025-03-06 7:13 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/cpu: Update x86_match_cpu() to also use cpu-type Pawan Gupta
2025-03-06 7:13 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/bugs: Declutter vulnerable CPU list Pawan Gupta
2025-03-06 15:18 ` Dave Hansen
2025-03-06 16:57 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-03-06 17:03 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-03-06 17:20 ` Pawan Gupta
2025-03-06 7:13 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/rfds: Exclude P-only parts from the RFDS affected list Pawan Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39d1597a-d165-4f79-a2fc-d37fc2822909@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=Perry.Yuan@amd.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brice.goglin@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).