From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, james.clark@arm.com, ravi.bangoria@amd.com,
yu.c.chen@intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
gautham.shenoy@amd.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, yangjihong@bytedance.com,
void@manifault.com, tj@kernel.org, sshegde@linux.ibm.com,
ctshao@google.com, quic_zhonhan@quicinc.com,
thomas.falcon@intel.com, blakejones@google.com,
ashelat@redhat.com, leo.yan@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, yujie.liu@intel.com, graham.woodward@arm.com,
ben.gainey@arm.com, vineethr@linux.ibm.com,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, linux@treblig.org,
santosh.shukla@amd.com, sandipan.das@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] perf sched stats: Add support for live mode
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:35:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e218109-261d-4046-8cac-86aa1362ddda@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bda6c5d3-94cc-4f34-a3b6-b9a50c6b28e8@amd.com>
On 10/03/2026 10:08 am, Swapnil Sapkal wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> On 04-03-2026 00:17, Ian Rogers wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:02 AM Swapnil Sapkal
>> <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com> wrote:
>> [ snip ]
>>> + /* wait for signal */
>>> + pause();
>>
>> I'm seeing the perf sched stats test hang here, requiring me to kill
>> the perf process started by the test. It is unclear what signal is
>> being waited upon, but is there a race condition where the signal
>> could have occurred before the pause? Should the pause at least be
>> conditional on that happening? Given that a race condition would exist
>> even with a test, would it be better to use a condition variable?
>>
>
> I am able to reproduce the issue. There are other places also where the
> same issue can be reproduced. (e.g. with `perf lock contention -b`)
>
> I will propose a fix.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Ian
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Swapnil
Hi Swapnil,
I'm also seeing the same issue, did you come up with a fix yet? I think
checking the finish condition in a loop would work as long as it's
sleep() instead of pause(). Or if you want to use pause() you have to
mask the signals before launching and then do a sigsuspend() to unmask
and pause atomically.
I was able to reproduce it every time by using the runs per test option:
$ perf test -vvv -r 10 "perf sched stats tests"
Running multiple in parallel also showed another issue because the test
writes to and deletes perf.data in the current working directory.
Usually the tests do mktmp somewhere so they have a unique output dir to
not conflict with other tests.
Thanks
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 17:58 [PATCH v5 00/10] perf sched: Introduce stats tool Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] tools/lib: Add list_is_first() Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] perf header: Support CPU DOMAIN relation info Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-21 17:18 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-01-23 15:19 ` Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-23 16:31 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-01-26 14:46 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-26 17:12 ` Ian Rogers
2026-01-27 2:46 ` Oliver Sang
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] perf sched stats: Add record and rawdump support Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] perf sched stats: Add schedstat v16 support Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] perf sched stats: Add schedstat v17 support Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] perf sched stats: Add support for report subcommand Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] perf sched stats: Add support for live mode Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-22 0:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-01-22 1:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-01-22 15:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-01-22 15:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-03-03 18:47 ` Ian Rogers
2026-03-10 10:08 ` Swapnil Sapkal
2026-03-30 14:35 ` James Clark [this message]
2026-04-01 7:04 ` Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] perf sched stats: Add support for diff subcommand Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] perf sched stats: Add basic perf sched stats test Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-19 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] perf sched stats: Add details in man page Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-21 16:09 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] perf sched: Introduce stats tool Chen, Yu C
2026-01-21 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-21 17:12 ` Ian Rogers
2026-01-21 19:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-21 20:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-01-21 20:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-22 16:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-01-23 16:32 ` Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-23 16:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-01-23 16:42 ` Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-21 17:52 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-01-23 16:19 ` Swapnil Sapkal
2026-01-21 22:59 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e218109-261d-4046-8cac-86aa1362ddda@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashelat@redhat.com \
--cc=ben.gainey@arm.com \
--cc=blakejones@google.com \
--cc=ctshao@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=graham.woodward@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_zhonhan@quicinc.com \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vineethr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yangjihong@bytedance.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox