From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Jules Irenge' <jbi.octave@gmail.com>,
"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"irogers@google.com" <irogers@google.com>,
"adrian.hunter@intel.com" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/power: Use div64_u64 onstead of do_div()
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 16:25:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41180245c6e94a06b789cd44b8aebd62@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zi57-TMgU19puaQM@octinomon.home>
From: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
> Sent: 28 April 2024 17:40
>
> do_div() truncates a u64 divisor to 32 bit.
> This can lead to non-zero being truncated to zero for division.
>
> Fix coccinelle warning
> WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead
>
> Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/amd/power.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/power.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/power.c
> index 37d5b380516e..ff003c1a645b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/power.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/power.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> delta *= cpu_pwr_sample_ratio * 1000;
> tdelta = new_ptsc - prev_ptsc;
>
> - do_div(delta, tdelta);
> + div64_u64(delta, tdelta);
Nak - you've not tested it.
David
> local64_add(delta, &event->count);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.2
>
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-28 16:40 [PATCH] perf/x86/amd/power: Use div64_u64 onstead of do_div() Jules Irenge
2024-05-02 16:25 ` David Laight [this message]
2024-05-02 16:34 ` Jules Bashizi Irenge
2024-05-02 22:18 ` David Laight
2024-05-02 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-04 22:53 ` David Laight
2024-05-05 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-06 16:39 ` David Laight
2024-05-06 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-06 17:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-06 20:25 ` David Laight
2024-05-06 17:43 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41180245c6e94a06b789cd44b8aebd62@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jbi.octave@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).