From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
To: jean.pihet@newoldbits.com
Cc: perf group <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, wangnan0@huawei.com
Subject: perf call stacks on 32bit ARM v7
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 23:25:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4233607.GXAFRqVoOG@agathebauer> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1517 bytes --]
Hello Jean, others.
Can someone please clarify the requirements for getting perf to properly
unwind the call stack on 32bit ARM v7?
Looking at [1], it seems that I need either (a) frame pointers, or (b) DWARF
debug information. Because (a) is often not available, and (b) is too large
for small flash drives on embedded - how do I use perf with split debug
information files? I.e. I have tries to record on the arm board using DWARF:
arm-v7$ perf record --call-graph dwarf ...
Then transferred the perf.data file over to my host machine. Perf archive said
that no build-id's could be found, so I'm not using that. Instead, I try to
ask perf to find the split debug packes using symfs:
x86-64$ perf report --symfs ... -g graph
But that does not work and I'm not seeing any backtraces. Stracing the report,
I don't see it even trying to access files - how can I debug this and figure
out what I'm supposed to be using?
Also according to [1], ARM .exidx unwind tables (c) are not supported by perf
- is that still the case? If so, what is holding back support for that in
perf, considering that libunwind supposedly supports unwinding using that
information?
Thanks
[1]: https://archive.fosdem.org/2015/schedule/event/arm_perf/attachments/
slides/601/export/events/attachments/arm_perf/slides/601/
Fosdem_2015_perf_status_on_ARM_and_ARM64.pdf
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5903 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-27 21:25 Milian Wolff [this message]
2016-09-28 1:43 ` perf call stacks on 32bit ARM v7 Wangnan (F)
[not found] ` <CAORVsuUB1AwtZxnNS-Z5pXdcDfrD=GWr43C=NMZsVq=CdqR5xA@mail.gmail.com>
2016-09-29 10:33 ` Milian Wolff
2016-09-30 7:32 ` Jean Pihet
2016-10-02 21:12 ` Milian Wolff
2016-10-04 8:41 ` Jean Pihet
2016-10-04 12:01 ` Milian Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4233607.GXAFRqVoOG@agathebauer \
--to=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).