linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@google.com>,
	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
	Florian Fischer <florian.fischer@muhq.space>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] perf record: Early auxtrace initialization before event parsing
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 10:32:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4473367b-38e1-7c15-3937-a077d68410b7@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2aed81ff-2d28-3af5-0657-16ee69705c03@linux.intel.com>

On 3/03/23 18:40, Liang, Kan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023-03-02 4:25 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
>> This allows event parsing to use the evsel__is_aux_event function,
>> which is important when determining event grouping.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>>  tools/perf/builtin-record.c         |  6 ++++++
>>  tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h          |  2 ++
>>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
>> index 3da506e13f49..de1e4842ea2e 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/auxtrace.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,19 @@
>>  #include "../../../util/intel-bts.h"
>>  #include "../../../util/evlist.h"
>>  
>> +void auxtrace__early_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct perf_pmu *intel_pt_pmu;
>> +	struct perf_pmu *intel_bts_pmu;
>> +
>> +	intel_pt_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_PT_PMU_NAME);
>> +	if (intel_pt_pmu)
>> +		intel_pt_pmu->auxtrace = true;
>> +	intel_bts_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_BTS_PMU_NAME);
>> +	if (intel_bts_pmu)
>> +		intel_bts_pmu->auxtrace = true;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static
>>  struct auxtrace_record *auxtrace_record__init_intel(struct evlist *evlist,
>>  						    int *err)
>> @@ -26,11 +39,7 @@ struct auxtrace_record *auxtrace_record__init_intel(struct evlist *evlist,
>>  	bool found_bts = false;
>>  
>>  	intel_pt_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_PT_PMU_NAME);
>> -	if (intel_pt_pmu)
>> -		intel_pt_pmu->auxtrace = true;
>>  	intel_bts_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_BTS_PMU_NAME);
>> -	if (intel_bts_pmu)
>> -		intel_bts_pmu->auxtrace = true;
>>  
>>  	evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
>>  		if (intel_pt_pmu && evsel->core.attr.type == intel_pt_pmu->type)
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>> index 8374117e66f6..a0870c076dc0 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>> @@ -3940,6 +3940,10 @@ static int record__init_thread_masks(struct record *rec)
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +__weak void auxtrace__early_init(void)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>>  int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>>  {
>>  	int err;
>> @@ -3985,6 +3989,8 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>>  	if (err)
>>  		return err;
>>  
>> +	auxtrace__early_init();
> 
> So the auxtrace__early_init() will be unconditionally invoked even there
> is no PT or BTS events, right?
> 
> Maybe we should move the auxtrace__early_init() to evsel__is_aux_event()
> and cache the value. The initialization will only be invoked when it's
> required.

Although perf_pmu__find() will be called unconditionally via
record__auxtrace_init() anyway.

> Something as below (not tested.)
> 
> +void auxtrace__init(void)
> +{
> +	struct perf_pmu *intel_pt_pmu;
> +	struct perf_pmu *intel_bts_pmu;
> +	static bool cached;
> +
> +	if (cached)
> +		return;
> +	intel_pt_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_PT_PMU_NAME);
> +	if (intel_pt_pmu)
> +		intel_pt_pmu->auxtrace = true;
> +	intel_bts_pmu = perf_pmu__find(INTEL_BTS_PMU_NAME);
> +	if (intel_bts_pmu)
> +		intel_bts_pmu->auxtrace = true;
> +}
> 
> bool evsel__is_aux_event(struct evsel *evsel)
> {
> 	struct perf_pmu *pmu = evsel__find_pmu(evsel);
> +	auxtrace__init();
> 	return pmu && pmu->auxtrace;
> }
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Kan
> 
>> +
>>  	argc = parse_options(argc, argv, record_options, record_usage,
>>  			    PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
>>  	if (quiet)
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
>> index 29eb82dff574..49a86aa6ac94 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
>> @@ -457,6 +457,8 @@ struct addr_filters {
>>  
>>  struct auxtrace_cache;
>>  
>> +void auxtrace__early_init(void);
>> +
>>  #ifdef HAVE_AUXTRACE_SUPPORT
>>  
>>  u64 compat_auxtrace_mmap__read_head(struct auxtrace_mmap *mm);


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-05  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-02 21:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] Better fixes for grouping of events Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] libperf evlist: Avoid a use of evsel idx Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] perf stat: Don't remove all grouped events when CPU maps disagree Ian Rogers
2023-03-03 15:50   ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-03 16:44     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-03 17:36       ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] perf record: Early auxtrace initialization before event parsing Ian Rogers
2023-03-03 16:40   ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-05  8:32     ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2023-03-06  9:31       ` Adrian Hunter
2023-03-06 14:10         ` Liang, Kan
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] perf stat: Modify the group test Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] perf evsel: Allow const evsel for certain accesses Ian Rogers
2023-03-03  0:14   ` Namhyung Kim
2023-03-03  1:40     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] perf evsel: Add function to compute pmu_name Ian Rogers
2023-03-03  0:18   ` Namhyung Kim
2023-03-03  1:41     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] perf parse-events: Pass ownership of the group name Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] perf parse-events: Sort and group parsed events Ian Rogers
2023-03-03  0:37   ` Namhyung Kim
2023-03-03  1:39     ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-04  2:22       ` Namhyung Kim
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] perf evsel: Remove use_uncore_alias Ian Rogers
2023-03-02 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] perf evlist: Remove nr_groups Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4473367b-38e1-7c15-3937-a077d68410b7@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=florian.fischer@muhq.space \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=sesse@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).