From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Ahern" Subject: Re: off-box analysis of perf.data file Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 08:44:06 -0700 Message-ID: <4CE7ECC6.5090501@cisco.com> References: <4CE0B108.8020205@cisco.com> <20101116234042.GA4856@ghostprotocols.net> <4CE465E9.4070107@cisco.com> <20101118201923.GA21029@ghostprotocols.net> <4CE5A093.8020809@cisco.com> <20101119125046.GA24999@ghostprotocols.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]:49720 "EHLO sj-iport-4.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753032Ab0KTPoI (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:44:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101119125046.GA24999@ghostprotocols.net> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On 11/19/10 05:50, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Yeah, I think it is worth having it for maximum flexibility, can you try > to implement it and post the patch for discussion? What git tree should be used for posting patches? David