From: David Ahern <daahern@cisco.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Profiling a program's runtime
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:10:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D4C4105.3050002@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110204174750.GD1808@nowhere>
On 02/04/11 10:47, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> I want that not only the CPU time is counted that my task uses, but also the
>> time my task waits.
>
> The time your task waits, other tasks executes :-/ (including idle in the scheme)
>
>> For example, if my task waits for network packets in a read() then the time
>> should be added to the read() function. Other profilers I know would not
>> count the time when the process is blocked.
You can determine time blocked on read (and other system calls) by
acquiring all context switches:
perf record -e cs -c 1 -a
From there you'll want to generate a time history output. To use
unmodified perf code use the -D option to dump raw samples (perf report
-D). You can find the process of interest and the kernel timestamp
between schedule out events -- and the sched out event before your
process. Together you can piece together the time you blocked on read.
Alternatively, there are add-on patches which dump the timehistory in a
pretty print format:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org/msg00049.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org/msg00047.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org/msg00048.html
That output can be manipulated much easier to determine time on the
processor and time between schedule-in events.
Not the complete picture of what I think you are looking for -- but a
way to get the time blocked on syscall stats via perf.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 14:38 Profiling a program's runtime Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 17:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-04 17:41 ` Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 17:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-04 18:10 ` David Ahern [this message]
2011-02-04 18:33 ` Maucci, Cyrille
2011-02-04 19:48 ` Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 19:57 ` Maucci, Cyrille
2011-02-07 20:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-04 19:51 ` Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-05 0:56 ` David Ahern
2011-02-04 19:24 ` Christoph Bartoschek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D4C4105.3050002@cisco.com \
--to=daahern@cisco.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=bartoschek@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).