From: David Ahern <daahern@cisco.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
acme@ghostprotocols.net, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org,
paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf script: change process_event prototype
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:11:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6FA19A.3040604@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110303024003.GC1946@nowhere>
On 03/02/2011 07:40 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:29:18AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> Prepare for handling of samples for any event type.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <daahern@cisco.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 40 +++++++++++--------
>> .../util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c | 20 ++++++++-
>
> What about Perl?
Oversight. Stumbled onto it yesterday afternoon. I have the perl module
installed now, so builds will get it too from now on.
>
>> tools/perf/util/trace-event-scripting.c | 8 +--
>> tools/perf/util/trace-event.h | 6 ++-
>> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
>> index 5f40df6..0bee150 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,27 @@ static u64 last_timestamp;
>> static u64 nr_unordered;
>> extern const struct option record_options[];
>>
>> +static void process_event(union perf_event *event,
>> + struct perf_sample *sample,
>> + struct perf_session *session)
>> +{
>> + struct thread *thread = perf_session__findnew(session, event->ip.pid);
>> +
>> + if (thread == NULL) {
>> + pr_debug("problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
>> + event->header.type);
>> + return;
>> + }
>
> Seems the thread is needed by any endpoints. It would be better to resolve
> it from process_sample_event and pass it to the process_event() handler.
tracepoints yes; S/W samples no. If you want it I'll add it.
>
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * FIXME: better resolve from pid from the struct trace_entry
>> + * field, although it should be the same than this perf
>> + * event pid
>> + */
>> + print_event(sample->cpu, sample->raw_data, sample->raw_size,
>> + sample->time, thread->comm);
>> +}
> [...]
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
>> index 2040b85..5b03fb6 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c
>> @@ -204,9 +204,9 @@ static inline struct event *find_cache_event(int type)
>> return event;
>> }
>>
>> -static void python_process_event(int cpu, void *data,
>> - int size __unused,
>> - unsigned long long nsecs, char *comm)
>> +static void python_process_event(union perf_event *pevent,
>> + struct perf_sample *sample,
>> + struct perf_session *session)
>> {
>> PyObject *handler, *retval, *context, *t, *obj, *dict = NULL;
>> static char handler_name[256];
>> @@ -218,6 +218,20 @@ static void python_process_event(int cpu, void *data,
>> int type;
>> int pid;
>
> Please avoid such blank line in the middle of local vars declaration.
ok.
David
>
>> + int cpu = sample->cpu;
>> + void *data = sample->raw_data;
>> + unsigned long long nsecs = sample->time;
>> + char *comm;
>> + struct thread *thread;
>> +
>> + thread = perf_session__findnew(session, pevent->ip.pid);
>> + if (thread == NULL) {
>> + pr_debug("problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
>> + pevent->header.type);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + comm = thread->comm;
>> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-03 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-02 17:29 [PATCH 0/3] perf script: add support for S/W events and H/W based profiling David Ahern
2011-03-02 17:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf script: change process_event prototype David Ahern
2011-03-03 2:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-03-03 14:11 ` David Ahern [this message]
2011-03-03 17:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-03-02 17:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf script: prepare to handle more than tracepoint events David Ahern
2011-03-02 17:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf script: dump software events and samples from hardware-based profiling David Ahern
2011-03-03 3:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-03-03 14:20 ` David Ahern
2011-03-03 17:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-03-03 17:30 ` David Ahern
2011-03-03 18:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6FA19A.3040604@cisco.com \
--to=daahern@cisco.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).