linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] perf: add reference time event
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:10:38 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3AB66E.7070201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110712143024.GA9201@somewhere>

On 07/12/2011 08:30 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:20:29PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 06/17/2011 08:17 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:04:59AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06/17/2011 07:32 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 05:55:46PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>>>>>> For initial perf_clock to time-of-day correlation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/event.c   |    1 +
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/event.h   |    8 ++++++++
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/session.c |    4 ++++
>>>>>>  tools/perf/util/session.h |    3 ++-
>>>>>>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.c b/tools/perf/util/event.c
>>>>>> index 3c1b8a6..1a89a04 100644
>>>>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/event.c
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.c
>>>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static const char *perf_event__names[] = {
>>>>>>  	[PERF_RECORD_HEADER_TRACING_DATA]	= "TRACING_DATA",
>>>>>>  	[PERF_RECORD_HEADER_BUILD_ID]		= "BUILD_ID",
>>>>>>  	[PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND]		= "FINISHED_ROUND",
>>>>>> +	[PERF_RECORD_REFTIME]			= "REF_TIME",
>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  const char *perf_event__name(unsigned int id)
>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.h b/tools/perf/util/event.h
>>>>>> index 1d7f664..f481f90 100644
>>>>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/event.h
>>>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.h
>>>>>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ enum perf_user_event_type { /* above any possible kernel type */
>>>>>>  	PERF_RECORD_HEADER_TRACING_DATA		= 66,
>>>>>>  	PERF_RECORD_HEADER_BUILD_ID		= 67,
>>>>>>  	PERF_RECORD_FINISHED_ROUND		= 68,
>>>>>> +	PERF_RECORD_REFTIME			= 69,
>>>>>
>>>>> We would like to avoid adding more custom events like these. They were very convenient
>>>>> but they steal the kernel event type space. They are deemed for removal in the long term.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another idea to achieve what you want would be to create a new perf event header feature,
>>>>> like HEADER_TRACE_INFO or HEADER_BUILD_ID are. Then use that to create a space in the perf
>>>>> file to save that couple of clocks initial values.
>>>>
>>>> you mean like this:
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/12/7/813
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>
>>> Exactly, why did you change?
>>
>> Finally getting back to this.
>>
>> The answer to the 'why' is that putting a reference timestamp in the
>> header field does not work for file appends across reboots. ie., the case:
>> perf record --tod ...
>> reboot
>> perf record -A --tod ...
> 
> Damn append mode. I doubt that thing is really used. And it just complexifies
> everything. It might be wise to get rid of it?
> 
> Ingo, Peter, Arnaldo?
>  
>> perf_clock timestamps change across reboots so the reference time
>> created by the first invocation is not valid for the append case. The
>> discussion then drifted towards having a kernel side event which per
>> past patch sets has its own issues.
>>
>> So to summarize the options proposed to date and issues with the proposals:
>> 1. reference timestamp in header
>>    - does not work for appends across reboots
>>
>> 2. synthesized events
>>    - preference against them
>>
>> 3. kernel side event
>>    - cannot generate an initial sample (with counter value and
>> perf_clock timestamp) on demand - e.g., start of session; a proposal to
>> use an ioctl to add one to the event stream was shot down
>>
>> At this point the only idea that comes to mind is to use a combination
>> of 2 and 3: add the kernel side clock event
>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/18/11), read the realtime clock counter,
>> read the monotonic clock timestamp (ie., perf_clock value), and
>> synthesize a perf sample that is written to the file. The append case
>> (with mismatch in --tod options between record invocations) would be
>> handled by having the kernel side clock event in the event list
>> (perf_evlist__equal would fail if --tod was not used for all invocations).
> 
> Actually you first have to face a deeper problem. events are not stored
> in order in the flow, but they are sorted from perf_session__process_events().
> 
> The bunch of sorted events is flushed periodically and sent to the consumer.
> 
> See flush_sample_queue().
> 
> And this sorting is made on top of the sample->time timestamps. So events
> are first sorted on sample->time and only afterward you have access to your
> gtod tracepoint samples. But if that gtod sample has been taken after a reboot
> then its sample->time is not consistant with the rest. It is not well sorted
> and thus the reftime won't be updated at the right moment.
> 
> So the problem is that reftime update already depends on a consistant cpu
> timestamp.
> 
> I can't think about a sane way to work around that. Sorting on gtod + cpu timestamp
> is not a solution because gtod can change.
> 
> I'd rather propose to refuse append mode as long as we have any timestamp. That includes
> gtod but also sample timestamps. They are buggy if we reboot.

Arnaldo's sending patches, so I take it he's dug out from backlog. ;-)

Any objections to not allowing append mode for perf-record if samples
contain timestamps?

David

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-04 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-07 23:53 [PATCH 0/6] Add time-of-day option to perf events David Ahern
2011-06-07 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] trace: add tracepoints to timekeeping code - xtime changes David Ahern
2011-06-17 13:23   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-17 14:13     ` David Ahern
2011-06-17 14:19       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-15  4:03       ` David Ahern
2011-06-07 23:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf utils: export parse_single_tracepoint_event David Ahern
2011-06-07 23:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf: add reference time event David Ahern
2011-06-17 13:32   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-17 14:04     ` David Ahern
2011-06-17 14:17       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-17 14:28         ` David Ahern
2011-07-11  4:20         ` David Ahern
2011-07-12 14:30           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-12 16:35             ` David Ahern
2011-07-12 17:03               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-04 15:10             ` David Ahern [this message]
     [not found]               ` <20110808193033.GA2744@ghostprotocols.net>
2011-08-15  4:06                 ` David Ahern
2011-06-07 23:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf record: add time-of-day option David Ahern
2011-06-17 14:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-17 14:23     ` David Ahern
2011-06-17 15:15       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-15  4:24         ` David Ahern
2011-06-07 23:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf script: pass trace event to print_trace_event David Ahern
2011-06-07 23:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf script: add time-of-day option for displaying events David Ahern
2011-06-14 18:42 ` [PATCH 0/6] Add time-of-day option to perf events David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E3AB66E.7070201@gmail.com \
    --to=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).