From: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
mingo@elte.hu, Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: Profiling sleep times?
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:53:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8A2EC5.1030901@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317673027.20367.41.camel@twins>
On 10/3/11 1:17 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 12:38 -0700, Arun Sharma wrote:
>> trace_sched_stat_sleep(tsk, delta);
>
> That one should be accessible as a tracepoint and will add delay to
> count on each occurrence.
Right - the tracepoint seems to work. Was looking for the user stack
trace as well. For eg:
# cat foo.c
#include <unistd.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <sys/select.h>
main()
{
struct timespec ts1;
struct timeval tv1;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
ts1.tv_sec = 0;
ts1.tv_nsec = 1000000;
nanosleep(&ts1, NULL);
tv1.tv_sec = 0;
tv1.tv_usec = 4000;
select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, &tv1);
}
}
I want something that gives me 4 times as many samples on select() as
nanosleep().
perf record -g -e sched:sched_stat_sleep -- ./foo
doesn't seem to do it. Additionally, if I have a burn_1us_cpu() loop in
there, I'd expect to see as many samples as nanosleep() in the wall
clock profile.
-Arun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 19:38 Profiling sleep times? Arun Sharma
2011-10-03 20:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-03 21:53 ` Arun Sharma [this message]
2011-10-04 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 21:56 ` Arun Sharma
2011-10-07 0:05 ` Arun Sharma
2011-10-07 1:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 5:42 ` avagin
2011-10-07 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 17:58 ` Arun Sharma
2011-10-07 23:16 ` avagin
2011-10-08 1:45 ` avagin
2011-10-10 18:50 ` Arun Sharma
2011-10-12 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-13 5:39 ` Andrew Vagin
2011-10-14 21:19 ` Arun Sharma
2011-10-15 17:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-15 19:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-15 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-18 1:07 ` Arun Sharma
2011-10-22 10:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-22 16:22 ` Andrew Wagin
2011-10-23 0:27 ` Arun Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E8A2EC5.1030901@fb.com \
--to=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).