From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
To: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf: add sort by inclusive time functionality (v2)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:43:27 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5DA91F.7060908@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331160079-13821-1-git-send-email-asharma@fb.com>
Hi,
2012-03-08 7:41 AM, Arun Sharma wrote:
> This patch series refactors existing code a bit and adds sort by
> inclusive time (time spent in the function + callees).
>
> Sample command lines:
>
> # perf record -ag -- sleep 1
> # perf report -g graph,0.5,callee -n -s inclusive
>
> Known bugs:
>
> total_period computation is broken for order=callee
>
I'd like to add two more :).
* If perf record misses callchain info, perf report will get stuck.
* If it's used with "symbol" sort order, it'll get stuck too.
BTW, I don't like the name 'inclusive' as a sort key. If it cares about time,
IMHO, the name should contain 'time' - something like 'itime' or 'inctime'?
Furthermore, I don't think it is a sort key. As it doesn't sort anything, and
only affects the way calculating symbol's period value, wouldn't it be better
making it a separate switch rather than a sort key? Plus, checking whether it
has callchain data and symbol sort key might be added also.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-12 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-07 22:41 [PATCH 0/2] perf: add sort by inclusive time functionality (v2) Arun Sharma
2012-03-07 22:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: refactor add_hist_entry() code paths Arun Sharma
2012-03-07 22:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE Arun Sharma
2012-03-07 23:13 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-08 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-12 19:35 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-08 15:39 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-08 18:22 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-13 13:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-08 7:29 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf: add sort by inclusive time functionality (v2) Ingo Molnar
2012-03-08 15:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-08 18:49 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-12 7:15 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-12 18:05 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-13 1:11 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-12 7:43 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-03-12 18:21 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-12 19:58 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-13 1:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-15 14:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-15 17:41 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-13 1:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-13 18:45 ` Arun Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5DA91F.7060908@lge.com \
--to=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).