From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: --mmap-pages option seemingly has no effect to help with LOST samples
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:48:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD8B641.9040907@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD8B32C.60608@us.ibm.com>
On 6/13/12 9:35 AM, Maynard Johnson wrote:
>> I think you are killing your box with NMIs based on the low period (-c
>> arg). I suggest increasing the period.
> OK, I'll buy that, as I think I only saw these messages when using the
> highest sampling rate. But at the mid-level sampling rate that I used
> (which would have been 100,000), where I still see a lot of LOST samples
> . . . any thoughts on why bumping up the --mmap-pages didn't help?
The default is 128 pages = 512k of RAM per CPU. If you look at pmap
$(pidof perf) you will see a 516k map per CPU. My primary box is a dual
socket, quad core with HT, so I have 16 of these:
00007f7655186000 516K rw-s- [ anon ]
If you bump the number of pages, those segments should increase. e.g.,
using -m 512 I get 16 segments of 2M:
00007f804a9dd000 2052K rw-s- [ anon ]
This is using latest perf source, not RHEL6, but I do not recall many
changes for the mapped pages.
>
> By the way, in digging into question #2 below, it appears kernel
> throttling *did* occur (seeing this in the raw report data), but
> probably not until after some samples were already lost.
Throttling is based on interrupt rate, so it will be independent of lost
samples. Default throttling kicks in at 100k:
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_sample_rate
100000
For my box that is too high - I've seen the PMU reset because of too
many nmis.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-12 20:55 --mmap-pages option seemingly has no effect to help with LOST samples Maynard Johnson
2012-06-12 21:05 ` David Ahern
2012-06-13 15:35 ` Maynard Johnson
2012-06-13 15:48 ` David Ahern [this message]
2012-06-22 15:59 ` Maynard Johnson
2012-06-22 16:16 ` David Ahern
2012-06-22 19:20 ` Maynard Johnson
2012-06-22 19:44 ` David Ahern
2012-06-22 20:23 ` Maynard Johnson
2012-06-22 20:38 ` David Ahern
2012-06-25 14:10 ` Maynard Johnson
2012-06-26 20:16 ` David Ahern
2012-06-26 20:32 ` Maynard Johnson
2012-06-22 19:23 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD8B641.9040907@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).