linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chulmin Kim <cmkim@core.kaist.ac.kr>
To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about LLC-load-misses event
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 22:31:34 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507C1036.7020707@core.kaist.ac.kr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507C0A9F.8060405@core.kaist.ac.kr>

2012-10-15 오후 10:07, Chulmin Kim 쓴 글:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'm currently evaluating memory performance of my own machine (intel
> x5650 cpu).
> My machine can have NUMA configuration, but it is under control. (only
> local mem access allowed)
>
> As i run STREAM benchmark, i monitor LLC cache misses using "perf"
> simultaneously.
To be specific, I used STREAM Copy benchmark (which just copies memory
space by "a[i]=b[i]" repeatedly using for loop.)
> (perf command : perf stat -a -A -e LLC-loads -e LLC-load-misses -e
> instructions sleep 3)
>
> The problem is,, the bandwidth from STREAM benchmark does not match with
> the monitored value.
>
> e.g.
> I got 9395MB/s from Stream.
>
> "perf" shows 134,642,063 LLC-load-misses for 3 seconds.
> -> BW = ((# of events)/(3 seconds)) * 64 bytes / (1024*1024) = 2739MB/s
> In this equation, the term (64bytes) is for cache line size, and the
> term(1024*1024) is for (MB/s).
>
> Why does this mismatch occur?
In case of Oprofile, the value for a certain event represents the number
of the overflows which occur when the number of the event exceeds the
predefined value.
Is it a similar case with that?

>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-15 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-15 13:07 Question about LLC-load-misses event Chulmin Kim
2012-10-15 13:31 ` Chulmin Kim [this message]
2012-10-23  5:39   ` Namhyung Kim
2012-10-23  5:53     ` Chulmin Kim
2012-10-24 12:56       ` Chulmin Kim
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-15 12:59 Chulmin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507C1036.7020707@core.kaist.ac.kr \
    --to=cmkim@core.kaist.ac.kr \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).