From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Implement global init callback for GNR uncore
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:46:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <507feaea-25fc-4111-a39b-648ce44e3316@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527151154.130505-7-zide.chen@intel.com>
On 5/27/2026 11:11 PM, Zide Chen wrote:
> On Sierra Forest and Clearwater Forest, the FRZ_ALL bit in the global
> control register defaults to 0 at boot, but UBOX PMON units do not
> work until the global control register is explicitly written with 0
> to trigger hardware initialization properly.
>
> Implement the generic uncore_msr_global_init() callback and add it to
> gnr_uncore_init[], which is shared by GNR, GRR, SRF, and CWF.
Need a "Fixes" tag?
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> V2:
> - Propagate return value of wrmsrq_on_cpu() to global_init().
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> index 4b3a1fa5b41b..7857959c6e82 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> @@ -1716,7 +1716,7 @@ static int __init uncore_mmio_init(void)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int uncore_mmio_global_init(u64 ctl)
> +static int uncore_mmio_global_init(int die, u64 ctl)
> {
> void __iomem *io_addr;
>
> @@ -1731,6 +1731,16 @@ static int uncore_mmio_global_init(u64 ctl)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int uncore_msr_global_init(int die, u64 msr)
> +{
> + int cpu = uncore_die_to_cpu(die);
> +
> + if (cpu == -1)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + return wrmsrq_on_cpu(cpu, msr, 0);
> +}
> +
> static const struct uncore_plat_init nhm_uncore_init __initconst = {
> .cpu_init = nhm_uncore_cpu_init,
> };
> @@ -1871,6 +1881,7 @@ static const struct uncore_plat_init gnr_uncore_init __initconst = {
> .domain[0].base_is_pci = true,
> .domain[0].discovery_base = UNCORE_DISCOVERY_TABLE_DEVICE,
> .domain[0].units_ignore = gnr_uncore_units_ignore,
> + .domain[0].global_init = uncore_msr_global_init,
> };
>
> static const struct uncore_plat_init dmr_uncore_init __initconst = {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> index 94c68e3417b6..c2e5ccb1d72c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct uncore_discovery_domain {
> /* MSR address or PCI device used as the discovery base */
> u32 discovery_base;
> bool base_is_pci;
> - int (*global_init)(u64 ctl);
> + int (*global_init)(int die, u64 ctl);
>
> /* The units in the discovery table should be ignored. */
> int *units_ignore;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
> index af2217b44a81..e36613d934b1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int __parse_discovery_table(struct uncore_discovery_domain *domain,
> if (!io_addr)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (domain->global_init && domain->global_init(global.ctl)) {
> + if (domain->global_init && domain->global_init(die, global.ctl)) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
> goto out;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-27 15:11 [PATCH V2 1/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix discovery unit lookup for multi-die systems Zide Chen
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Guard against invalid box control address Zide Chen
2026-05-27 17:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 6:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix PCI device refcount leak in UPI discovery Zide Chen
2026-05-28 6:34 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Defer ADL global PMON enable to enable_box() Zide Chen
2026-05-27 18:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 6:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-28 18:07 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move die_to_cpu() to uncore.c Zide Chen
2026-05-28 6:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_die_to_cpu() for offline dies Zide Chen
2026-05-27 19:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 6:38 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-05-27 15:11 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Implement global init callback for GNR uncore Zide Chen
2026-05-27 20:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 6:46 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-05-28 18:14 ` Chen, Zide
2026-05-27 15:45 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix discovery unit lookup for multi-die systems sashiko-bot
2026-05-28 6:01 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=507feaea-25fc-4111-a39b-648ce44e3316@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox