From: Manuel Selva <selva.manuel@gmail.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How does perf collects per thread/process events ?
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:50:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ECD63E.5070305@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374466784.17730.12.camel@concordia>
Thanks for the answer Michael.
I just created an account to be able to edit the perf wiki page. Before
doing that, I am asking here if someone knows the policy to update this
wiki or who are the maintainers to ask them ?
Thanks,
Manu
On 07/22/2013 06:19 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:29 +0200, Manuel Selva wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My question regards a platform equipped with 2 Intel Xeon X5650.
>> According to the perf wiki page
>> (https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial), "by default perf stat
>> counts for all threads of the process and subsequent child processes and
>> threads" and "By default, perf stat counts in per-thread mode".
>>
>> So a first question is what is the default: per thread or per process ?
>
> It's per process, which is as described in the first quote above. The
> second quote is just wrong AFAICS.
>
>> Then, independently of the answer, I am wondering how does perf handles
>> per thread or per process regarding the scheduler and migrations. I
>> didn't find it explicitly in the Intel documentation but it seems
>> natural that hardware performance counters located on a given core are
>> only capable of counting event on this core and not on other cores. Is
>> it true ?
>>
>> Moreover, the wiki page says that "When a thread migrated from one
>> processor to another, counters are saved on the current processor and
>> are restored on the new one" (this seems to confirm the answer to my
>> previous question above). It means that the scheduler is aware about
>> "perf" or that perf is able to register a hook into the scheduler. So I
>> guess this is done in the kernel part of perf (in the implementation of
>> the perf_event_open system call) and not in the user land part, is it true ?
>
> Yes.
>
> cheers
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 15:29 How does perf collects per thread/process events ? Manuel Selva
2013-07-22 4:19 ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-22 6:50 ` Manuel Selva [this message]
2013-07-22 13:44 ` David Ahern
2013-07-22 15:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ECD63E.5070305@gmail.com \
--to=selva.manuel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).