From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: Information regarding the perf tool Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:39:03 -0600 Message-ID: <527287A7.3050908@gmail.com> References: <5266A57F.2000201@bsc.es> <87y55krw6f.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <52727B0C.5040402@bsc.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:44969 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751225Ab3JaQjH (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:39:07 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id g10so2596814pdj.20 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52727B0C.5040402@bsc.es> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Harald Servat , Andi Kleen Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On 10/31/13, 9:45 AM, Harald Servat wrote: > Can anyone point me where and how is the timestamp calculated for every > sample reported by perf? See perf_clock() in kernel/events/core.c David