From: Manuel Selva <selva.manuel@gmail.com>
To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Understanding perf mem -t load results
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:27:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52ADF48E.3060605@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1776760155.10395562.1386857164818.JavaMail.root@insa-lyon.fr>
Hi all,
Is there anyone here using the perf mem tool able to answer to my
previous questions ?
Thanks in advance,
----
Manu
On 12/12/2013 03:06 PM, Manuel Selva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to understand the output of the perf mem tool on my workstation with two intel Xeon X5650.
>
> I recorded a perf.data file with memory load sampling (write sampling is not availble for these processors) as following (in the root directory of a Linux kernel source tree):
>
> perf mem -t load rec -c 1 make -j18
>
> Then I am reporting the results with
>
> perf mem rep --sort=mem
>
> 97.00% 25519343 L1 hit
> 1.31% 43687 L3 hit
> 1.15% 37253 LFB hit
> 0.32% 3156 Remote Cache (1 hop) hit
> 0.14% 38579 L3 miss
> 0.05% 6309 L2 hit
> 0.03% 231 Remote RAM (1 hop) hit
> 0.00% 8 Local RAM hit
> 0.00% 2 Uncached hit
>
> As you can see, 97% of the loads (I am sampling all loads with -c 1: is it true ?) hit the L1 cache. My first question is about this high L1 hit ration and the small number of RAM requests (231 + 8). Is it realistic to have 97% of L1 hit and only 239 RAM accesses when compiling a Linux kernel ?
>
> Writing this email and looking again into Intel SDM I am thinking that the L3 misses are what is called "unknown L3 cache miss in SDM". As a consequence the total number of memory accesses would be L3 miss + Remote RAM + Local RAM, is it correct ?
>
> The second question is the Uncached hit: is it the Un-cacheable memory in the SDM ? If yes, I guess it's also a request to RAM.
>
> Finally, it's not very clear for me what Line Fill Buffer (LFB) is exactly and I was not able to find a pointer explaining that. Do you know where I can read information about this ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> ------
> Manuel
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-15 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 14:06 Understanding perf mem -t load results Manuel Selva
2013-12-15 18:27 ` Manuel Selva [this message]
2013-12-15 21:18 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-15 22:03 ` Manuel Selva
2013-12-15 23:45 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-16 9:13 ` Manuel Selva
2013-12-20 9:38 ` Manuel Selva
2013-12-24 2:18 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-24 7:10 ` Manuel Selva
2013-12-24 7:28 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-24 7:42 ` Manuel Selva
2013-12-24 21:27 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-25 10:25 ` Manuel Selva
2014-01-07 15:06 ` Manuel Selva
2014-01-07 21:27 ` Andi Kleen
2014-01-08 8:53 ` Manuel Selva
2014-01-08 9:50 ` Manuel Selva
2014-01-08 19:44 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52ADF48E.3060605@gmail.com \
--to=selva.manuel@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).