From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A780F35294E for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 23:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789430201; cv=none; b=I/WExkmKHYrv90koUTD5x719lnkMUsc8aJl+2Ts/du3xOJU9aySJ0oS2UlPnc6KU1bh7TqSC21HgMOa0usyonUA1dCp/c0IYB8Cw4W5kZPTyMtH+Xk/jWfmpu8FpwQPdPcnwcAzzlGzpATM28/HHFvnWnH7LorKtJ4KhDn76CNI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789430201; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NLYYf+n54O4H0h4Xt+zLB6Dbu2ghpzSMuLrDhogbWps=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=I72Ng8fOvb6B2Qgwzw+WWkwk9il4bb7CfRCvYM0V4PkfEy5Lzn9Np6FjTPvGaT4IL1ABBifP13ikp8CsS8ifVBRT9DCUzwHYBmuinGBRZxAHbVxCVmn/FrtgCF1O5n4Ck3FkiV/TWhui4fMaNGXLkLiJFq+crhabRFfXx33FjPU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=LA0HhwSi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LA0HhwSi" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1789430200; x=1820966200; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NLYYf+n54O4H0h4Xt+zLB6Dbu2ghpzSMuLrDhogbWps=; b=LA0HhwSiU3XzNy8QJ8JqLerPjA0bBHn/pak2S21q6ljkf71zEW0QJ61v M9Bhck/AOavQ9KXiJfrv7LI9B98f45XN0ZX3Wfq/Hn2aAWyQbHm/RpiGW fFgmH2+RzaE5mU8OCpFrlNQ6sZWpmo866nUcY4tL5dOH4OqiCoTePhDnM Y1P5O/RPTQlbyXwINpq0TOKA76mAyyn3MGTCKhyt345Afa2xcCz9qdfzf xIcNYRopsvnA+5oIGn+z7RxkxPekR2J/fISMrNxPuFJjrdKZPMPzGGjgw mFI22R3XnEmgtVgMQRFLRLklfbG6hqy8gpRZf5IqHSPjU/oWwDN+9D+DI w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: osWQgFXETTKE54eeCNjpdA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xmqZEqTVS1yIg4A517I9TQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11905"; a="112556240" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,103,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="112556240" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2026 16:56:39 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ZavR2ebUSGaGcpDK+0QzMQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: XxnNeEVNSjO4O7PS8/nMFA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from dapengmi-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.124.241.239]) ([10.124.241.239]) by fmviesa003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2026 16:56:38 -0700 Message-ID: <5335ab48-bea0-4f2d-9520-c8b8efbc62b6@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 07:56:36 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [Patch v11 07/10] perf regs: Enable dumping of SIMD registers To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org References: <20260914014049.2061519-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> <20260914014049.2061519-8-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> <20260914020418.97E881F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> <1870044f-ab4c-4906-8f8b-c3216fb28211@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: "Mi, Dapeng" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 9/15/2026 3:28 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 03:29:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2026 at 01:17:00PM +0800, Mi, Dapeng wrote: >>> On 9/14/2026 10:04 AM, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: >>>> [Severity: Low] >>>> Does this file need an explicit inclusion of ? >>>> The perf tool can be compiled with musl libc, which enforces strict POSIX >>>> namespace separation and does not implicitly include headers. Relying on >>>> implicit header inclusion for printf() can cause build failures under musl. >>> Ok, this can be fixed in a separate patch later. >> Ok, merging it now, later you send fixes for these minor issues. > It is now in tmp.perf-tools-next, will do the usual set of containerized > build tests and push, Thanks Arnaldo.  I would post the fixing patches later once this patch series is queued. :) > > - Arnaldo