linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/20] perf tools: Support to show SSP register
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:57:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <539d243b-ca9e-4849-be81-e755dc4ba528@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fV-+3dU1CtUAYazv5L6VfNwDxv1C9Q=tQXzve9nqpaqrw@mail.gmail.com>


On 1/24/2025 12:15 AM, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:21 PM Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Add SSP register support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h    | 4 +++-
>>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c           | 2 ++
>>  tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c                     | 2 +-
>>  tools/perf/util/perf-regs-arch/perf_regs_x86.c | 2 ++
>>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> index 7c9d2bb3833b..158e353070c3 100644
>> --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> @@ -27,9 +27,11 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
>>         PERF_REG_X86_R13,
>>         PERF_REG_X86_R14,
>>         PERF_REG_X86_R15,
>> +       PERF_REG_X86_SSP,
> nit: Would it be worth a comment here? SSP may not be apparent to
> everyone. Perhaps something like:
> ```
> /* Shadow stack pointer (SSP) present on Clearwater Forest and newer models. */

Sure.


> ```
>>         /* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
>>         PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
>> -       PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
>> +       PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_SSP + 1,
>> +       PERF_REG_INTEL_PT_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
> nit: It's a little peculiar to me the "+1" here - but that's
> pre-existing. Perhaps comments above here too:
> ```
> /* The MAX_REG_X86_64 used generally, for PEBS, etc. */
> PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_SSP + 1,
> /* The MAX_REG_INTEL_PT ignores the SSP register. */
> PERF_REG_INTEL_PT_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
> ```
> Otherwise:
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

Sure. Thanks.


>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>>         /* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
>>         PERF_REG_X86_XMM0  = 32,
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
>> index 12fd93f04802..9f492568f3b4 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
>> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ static const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
>>         SMPL_REG(R14, PERF_REG_X86_R14),
>>         SMPL_REG(R15, PERF_REG_X86_R15),
>>  #endif
>> +       SMPL_REG(SSP, PERF_REG_X86_SSP),
>> +
>>         SMPL_REG2(XMM0, PERF_REG_X86_XMM0),
>>         SMPL_REG2(XMM1, PERF_REG_X86_XMM1),
>>         SMPL_REG2(XMM2, PERF_REG_X86_XMM2),
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
>> index 30be6dfe09eb..86196275c1e7 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
>> @@ -2139,7 +2139,7 @@ static u64 *intel_pt_add_gp_regs(struct regs_dump *intr_regs, u64 *pos,
>>         u32 bit;
>>         int i;
>>
>> -       for (i = 0, bit = 1; i < PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX; i++, bit <<= 1) {
>> +       for (i = 0, bit = 1; i < PERF_REG_INTEL_PT_MAX; i++, bit <<= 1) {
>>                 /* Get the PEBS gp_regs array index */
>>                 int n = pebs_gp_regs[i] - 1;
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf-regs-arch/perf_regs_x86.c b/tools/perf/util/perf-regs-arch/perf_regs_x86.c
>> index 708954a9d35d..9a909f02bc04 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf-regs-arch/perf_regs_x86.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf-regs-arch/perf_regs_x86.c
>> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ const char *__perf_reg_name_x86(int id)
>>                 return "R14";
>>         case PERF_REG_X86_R15:
>>                 return "R15";
>> +       case PERF_REG_X86_SSP:
>> +               return "ssp";
>>
>>  #define XMM(x) \
>>         case PERF_REG_X86_XMM ## x:     \
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-23 14:07 [PATCH 00/20] Arch-PEBS and PMU supports for Clearwater Forest Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 01/20] perf/x86/intel: Add PMU support " Dapeng Mi
2025-01-27 16:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06  1:31     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-06  7:53       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06  9:35         ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-06  9:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 02/20] perf/x86/intel: Fix ARCH_PERFMON_NUM_COUNTER_LEAF Dapeng Mi
2025-01-27 16:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-27 16:43     ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-27 21:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-01-28  0:28         ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 03/20] perf/x86/intel: Parse CPUID archPerfmonExt leaves for non-hybrid CPUs Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 18:58   ` Andi Kleen
2025-01-27 15:19     ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-27 16:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06  2:09         ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 04/20] perf/x86/intel: Decouple BTS initialization from PEBS initialization Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 05/20] perf/x86/intel: Rename x86_pmu.pebs to x86_pmu.ds_pebs Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 06/20] perf/x86/intel: Initialize architectural PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-01-28 11:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-06  2:25     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 07/20] perf/x86/intel/ds: Factor out common PEBS processing code to functions Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 08/20] perf/x86/intel: Process arch-PEBS records or record fragments Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 09/20] perf/x86/intel: Factor out common functions to process PEBS groups Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 10/20] perf/x86/intel: Allocate arch-PEBS buffer and initialize PEBS_BASE MSR Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 11/20] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS constraints base on counter & pdist map Dapeng Mi
2025-01-27 16:07   ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-06  2:47     ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-02-06 15:01       ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-07  1:27         ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 12/20] perf/x86/intel: Setup PEBS data configuration and enable legacy groups Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 13/20] perf/x86/intel: Add SSP register support for arch-PEBS Dapeng Mi
2025-01-24  5:16   ` Andi Kleen
2025-01-27 15:38     ` Liang, Kan
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 14/20] perf/x86/intel: Add counter group " Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 15/20] perf/core: Support to capture higher width vector registers Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 16/20] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS vector registers group capturing Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 17/20] perf tools: Support to show SSP register Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 16:15   ` Ian Rogers
2025-02-06  2:57     ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 18/20] perf tools: Support to capture more vector registers (common part) Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 16:42   ` Ian Rogers
2025-01-27 15:50     ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-06  3:12       ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 19/20] perf tools: Support to capture more vector registers (x86/Intel part) Dapeng Mi
2025-01-23 14:07 ` [PATCH 20/20] perf tools/tests: Add vector registers PEBS sampling test Dapeng Mi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=539d243b-ca9e-4849-be81-e755dc4ba528@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).