linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	weilin.wang@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ze Gao <zegao2021@gmail.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Retirement latency perf stat support
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:22:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53dfaeae-b4eb-479e-938f-d0022c4f2416@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240425223406.471120-1-irogers@google.com>



On 2024-04-25 6:34 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> Support 'R' as a retirement latency modifier on events. When present
> the evsel will fork perf record and perf report commands, parsing the
> perf report output as the count value. The intent is to do something
> similar to Weilin's series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240402214436.1409476-1-weilin.wang@intel.com/
> 
> While the 'R' and the retirement latency are Intel specific, in the
> future I can imagine more evsel like commands that require child
> processes. We can make the logic more generic at that point.
>

I think in generic what we want is the weight/latency information of the
event. 'W' is already occupied by the weak group. Maybe 'L' is a more
generic name than 'R'. With the event modifier, perf collects and report
the weight/latency information of the event in a perf stat command.

Not just changing the evsel, I think a proper output is still required.
It's possible that an end user can use it without metrics. E.g.,
perf stat -e cycles,instructions:L
A possible generic output maybe

1,931,099,931	cycles
  801,826,458	instructions	# Avg Weight1 1000
				# Avg Weight2 800
				# Avg Weight3 500

Thanks,
Kan

> The code is untested on hardware that supports retirement latency, and
> with metrics with retirement latency in them. The record is also of
> sleep and various things need tweaking but I think v1 is good enough
> for people to give input.
> 
> The first patch stops opening a dummy event for tool events. I came
> across this while looking into the issue and we can likely just pick
> it first. I kept it in the series for cleanliness sake.
> 
> The code has benefitted greatly from Weilin's work and Namhyung's
> great review input.
> 
> Ian Rogers (3):
>   perf evsel: Don't open tool events
>   perf parse-events: Add a retirement latency modifier
>   perf evsel: Add retirement latency event support
> 
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c        | 186 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/evsel.h        |   4 +
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c |   2 +
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.h |   1 +
>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.l |   3 +-
>  5 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-26 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-25 22:34 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Retirement latency perf stat support Ian Rogers
2024-04-25 22:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] perf evsel: Don't open tool events Ian Rogers
2024-04-25 22:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] perf parse-events: Add a retirement latency modifier Ian Rogers
2024-04-25 22:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] perf evsel: Add retirement latency event support Ian Rogers
2024-04-25 22:41 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] Retirement latency perf stat support Ian Rogers
2024-04-26 17:22 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2024-04-26 17:34   ` Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53dfaeae-b4eb-479e-938f-d0022c4f2416@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=9erthalion6@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=weilin.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=zegao2021@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).