Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf x86 test: Update hybrid expectations

["Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>]

On 2024-01-03 12:01 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> The legacy events cpu-cycles and instructions have sysfs event
> equivalents on x86 (see /sys/devices/cpu_core/events). As sysfs/JSON
> events are now higher in priority than legacy events this causes the
> hybrid test expectations not to be met. To fix this switch to legacy
> events that don't have sysfs versions, namely cpu-cycles becomes
> cycles and instructions becomes branches.
> 
> Fixes: a24d9d9dc096 ("perf parse-events: Make legacy events lower priority than sysfs/JSON")
> Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZYbm5L7tw7bdpDpE@kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---

Thanks Ian. For the series,

Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Kan
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/hybrid.c | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/hybrid.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/hybrid.c
> index eb152770f148..05a5f81e8167 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/hybrid.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/hybrid.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int test__hybrid_hw_group_event(struct evlist *evlist)
>  	evsel = evsel__next(evsel);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type", PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE == evsel->core.attr.type);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong hybrid type", test_hybrid_type(evsel, PERF_TYPE_RAW));
> -	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config", test_config(evsel, PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS));
> +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config", test_config(evsel, PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS));
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong leader", evsel__has_leader(evsel, leader));
>  	return TEST_OK;
>  }
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static int test__hybrid_group_modifier1(struct evlist *evlist)
>  	evsel = evsel__next(evsel);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong type", PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE == evsel->core.attr.type);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong hybrid type", test_hybrid_type(evsel, PERF_TYPE_RAW));
> -	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config", test_config(evsel, PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS));
> +	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong config", test_config(evsel, PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS));
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong leader", evsel__has_leader(evsel, leader));
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_user", !evsel->core.attr.exclude_user);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong exclude_kernel", evsel->core.attr.exclude_kernel);
> @@ -171,27 +171,27 @@ struct evlist_test {
>  
>  static const struct evlist_test test__hybrid_events[] = {
>  	{
> -		.name  = "cpu_core/cpu-cycles/",
> +		.name  = "cpu_core/cycles/",
>  		.check = test__hybrid_hw_event_with_pmu,
>  		/* 0 */
>  	},
>  	{
> -		.name  = "{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu_core/instructions/}",
> +		.name  = "{cpu_core/cycles/,cpu_core/branches/}",
>  		.check = test__hybrid_hw_group_event,
>  		/* 1 */
>  	},
>  	{
> -		.name  = "{cpu-clock,cpu_core/cpu-cycles/}",
> +		.name  = "{cpu-clock,cpu_core/cycles/}",
>  		.check = test__hybrid_sw_hw_group_event,
>  		/* 2 */
>  	},
>  	{
> -		.name  = "{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/,cpu-clock}",
> +		.name  = "{cpu_core/cycles/,cpu-clock}",
>  		.check = test__hybrid_hw_sw_group_event,
>  		/* 3 */
>  	},
>  	{
> -		.name  = "{cpu_core/cpu-cycles/k,cpu_core/instructions/u}",
> +		.name  = "{cpu_core/cycles/k,cpu_core/branches/u}",
>  		.check = test__hybrid_group_modifier1,
>  		/* 4 */
>  	},